Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7535Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
From: Tom Roberts
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:01
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:01
58 lines
4313 bytes
4313 bytes
Wolfgang G. Gasser wrote: > Two distant observers with each a (transversal) LIGHT CLOCK orbit at a > constant distance around their common center (assumed at rest). > > Special relativity postulates that the light beams in both light clocks > propagate at c relative to both (almost inertially moving) observers. That is the key point -- these observers are NOT moving inertially. The approximation is important (see below), and negates your claims. > This requires that for each observer the clock rate of the opposite clock > CAN be lower than the clock rate of his own clock. > Because of symmetry and unchanging distance, clock rate CANNOT differ. The error is in your gedanken, not in SR itself. For approximately inertial motion, the basic equations of SR are only APPROXIMATELY valid. You ignored the approximation you, yourself, made. At a deeper level, however, such orbiting observers cannot be treated as inertial observers, because a circle is different topologically from a line. In SR's Minkowski spacetime, inertial observers move in straight lines, not in circles, and the basic equations of SR are valid for inertial observers and coordinates. Yes, for a very large radius a circle is approximately a straight line for a small portion of its circumference, but if one uses the fact it is a circle in any way, or uses a large fraction of the circumference, then these are not inertial observers, not even approximately. In your gedanken, you are using the circular motion when you say "because of symmetry and unchanging distance". The right way to consider this is to ask: for two observers on the circumference of a rotating disk, how do they observe the tick rate of each others' clocks? Assuming that each clock emits an EM signal at each tick, and the other observer receives this signal and compares the rate of the received signal to their own clock's tick rate, the answer is that both received signals have the same rate as the local clock. This answer is independent of radius, rotation rate, and separation of the two observers around the circle. Francois Guillet wrote: > Special relativity doesn't apply to non inertial reference frames. This is not true. The basic equations of SR are written in terms of inertial coordinates, and these equations are valid only in inertial frames. But one can use calculus to determine transforms to non-inertial coordinates, and SR remains valid using such coordinates and the transformed equations. SR applies only to Minkowski spacetime, however. That is, neither curvature of the manifold nor topology other than R^4 can be handled in SR. Tom Roberts
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newscon05.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr27.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!32b1cbcb!not-for-mailReferences:
<ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newscon05.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr27.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!32b1cbcb!not-for-mail From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity References: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> In-Reply-To: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 58 Message-ID: <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 131.225.56.117 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr27.news.prodigy.net 1167768073 ST000 131.225.56.117 (Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:01:13 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:01:13 EST Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com X-UserInfo1: FKPO@SVG_RRMBW\Y\BNB^^YJBHT@QDDMEPWXODMMHXMTWA]EPMVOPCWZBL[\YUWHANGYZEFNHFZPNLOBUNSS^_LGEVWEY\PHO@YJSSWBBDT\PFD^ESBTXVCCMTD]JCJLE\_IJMFNRY]SWE[S[D_CNB__ZK^VGVCKHA[S@COB^[@ZQSDFQ\BPMS@DZVUKQTJL Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:01:13 GMT