🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 07 May 1998 13:09:16 +0100, Joshua Hewitt <look@my.signature>
wrote:

>M.J. Needham wrote:
>> THE QUANTUM MATRIX
>
>I must admit I didn't get to the end of your post but...
>
>The burden of proof is on you. What testable predictions does your
>theory make that differ from current theories?
>
>I noticed a severe lack of structure to the TOE. You should start from a
>few central axioms and work your way up.
>
>Not one equation in a field theory? No use of symmetry?
>-- 
>:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
>:-) Joshua Hewitt; jhewitt[at]geocities.com                     :-)
>:-) Room 1109A, Astrophysics Group, Blackett Laboratory         :-)
>:-) Imperial College, Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2BZ, UK  :-)
>:-) Telephone: IC [+44 (0)171 59] 47907 / 47693                 :-)
>:-) http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/6253/index.html      :-)
>:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)


Thanks for the response.  I'm not familiar with the term "TOE" but I
sense that your tone is one of disapproval.

My paper is very ambitious of course.  It is an attempt to make sense
of a lot of different puzzles in our present understanding of physics
and to pull everything together and look at it from a different
perspective.   I would appreciate it if you would read the paper
through to the end and consider the ideas.  

Perhaps some testable predictions might occur to you.  I did mention
one in the posting: that of a Michelson-Morley interferometer
experiment but with one arm pointing vertically.  The slowed
decay of muons as they fall to earth which is cited as evidence
for relativity suggests that one.

M.J. Needham