Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #761THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE TO SPECIAL RELATIVITY
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:21
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:21
58 lines
4399 bytes
4399 bytes
Theoretically, the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment can be obtained by assuming that: (A) The speed of light varies with the speed of the light source (c'=c +v); the principle of relativity is correct; there are no miracles (length contraction, time dilation). (B) Einstein's 1905 light postulate (c'=c) is correct; the principle of relativity is correct; there are miracles (length contraction, time dilation). There is no reasonable third alternative. That is, Newton's emission theory of light with its constitutive equation c'=c+v is the ONLY alternative to special relativity. Moreover, the emission theory is TRUE and special relativity FALSE unless one finds natural that a long train can be trapped inside a short tunnel, an 80m long pole can be trapped inside a 40m long barn and a bug can be both dead and alive: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSRIyDfo_mY&mode=related&search http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/barn_pole.html "These are the props. You own a barn, 40m long, with automatic doors at either end, that can be opened and closed simultaneously by a switch. You also have a pole, 80m long, which of course won't fit in the barn. Now someone takes the pole and tries to run (at nearly the speed of light) through the barn with the pole horizontal. Special Relativity (SR) says that a moving object is contracted in the direction of motion: this is called the Lorentz Contraction. So, if the pole is set in motion lengthwise, then it will contract in the reference frame of a stationary observer.....So, as the pole passes through the barn, there is an instant when it is completely within the barn. At that instant, you close both doors simultaneously, with your switch. Of course, you open them again pretty quickly, but at least momentarily you had the contracted pole shut up in your barn. The runner emerges from the far door unscathed.....If the doors are kept shut the rod will obviously smash into the barn door at one end. If the door withstands this the leading end of the rod will come to rest in the frame of reference of the stationary observer. There can be no such thing as a rigid rod in relativity so the trailing end will not stop immediately and the rod will be compressed beyond the amount it was Lorentz contracted. If it does not explode under the strain and it is sufficiently elastic it will come to rest and start to spring back to its natural shape but since it is too big for the barn the other end is now going to crash into the back door and the rod will be trapped in a compressed state inside the barn." http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/Relativ/bugrivet.html "The bug-rivet paradox is a variation on the twin paradox and is similar to the pole-barn paradox.....The end of the rivet hits the bottom of the hole before the head of the rivet hits the wall. So it looks like the bug is squashed.....All this is nonsense from the bug's point of view. The rivet head hits the wall when the rivet end is just 0.35 cm down in the hole! The rivet doesn't get close to the bug....The paradox is not resolved." Pentcho Valev pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6a4c4a80-17c1-44b3-a054-45ee210e3af0@d27g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d27g2000yqf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,9528d98ea67f3429,start X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d27g2000yqf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique Subject: THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE TO SPECIAL RELATIVITY Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:21:41 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 58 Message-ID: <6a4c4a80-17c1-44b3-a054-45ee210e3af0@d27g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.215.201.48 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1266312102 22499 127.0.0.1 (16 Feb 2010 09:21:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d27g2000yqf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.215.201.48; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)