Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7769Re: Science and Philosophy: what is the difference?
From: Watson & Parisi
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 00:24
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 00:24
31 lines
2850 bytes
2850 bytes
"Steve Harris sbharris@ROMAN9.netcom.com" <sbharris@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:79cf0a8.0311121608.39ec0523@posting.google.com... > "Watson & Parisi" <niche@rcn.com> wrote in message news:<bortg7$1r7$1@bob.news.rcn.net>... > > The example is science itself. Empiricism is one epistemological philosophy > > among others, and the scientific method is its application. Science didn't > > spring fully armed from the head of Zeus, you know. It evolved out of > > philosophy, which includes the philosophy of science. > > > > Robert. > > > And modern plumbing didn't spring fully armed from the head of Zeus, > either. It also evolved out of philosophy, inasmuch as there must be a > philosophy of plumbing, yes? So QED. > > Alas, however, to talk about the philosophy of plumbing is to stretch > the word "philosophy" far past the purposes for which it was invented, > and in which, in modern times, it is used. Therefore your argument > needs reexamination. Plumbing is not a method for gaining knowledge; philosophy is. The empirical method of gaining knowledge by testing hypotheses through observation was an approach that developed over time, and that gained dominance because of its self correcting nature. Surely the development of the approach itself is a more fundamental insight than its particular applications, and that development falls into the realm of epistemology, like it or not. Robert.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bouirn$q95$1@bob.news.rcn.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!feed3.news.rcn.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<psasb.6842$9_.282814@news1.tin.it> <7ce4e226.0311111439.2ea5baff@posting.google.com> <bortg7$1r7$1@bob.news.rcn.net> <79cf0a8.0311121608.39ec0523@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10b271,1ebfdccb2dd8124d X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: f579b,1ebfdccb2dd8124d X-Google-Attributes: gidf579b,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,1ebfdccb2dd8124d X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-Thread: 10a86d,1ebfdccb2dd8124d X-Google-Attributes: gid10a86d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-12 16:23:02 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!feed3.news.rcn.net!not-for-mail From: "Watson & Parisi" <niche@rcn.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.philosophy.debate,it.scienza Subject: Re: Science and Philosophy: what is the difference? Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:24:55 -0600 Lines: 32 Message-ID: <bouirn$q95$1@bob.news.rcn.net> References: <psasb.6842$9_.282814@news1.tin.it> <7ce4e226.0311111439.2ea5baff@posting.google.com> <bortg7$1r7$1@bob.news.rcn.net> <79cf0a8.0311121608.39ec0523@posting.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVb7ABF9ZDH59chMGbrrfXi5bJtvn0mQm60QxVvXBqV6fvSL0hPi0r1J X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Nov 2003 00:22:15 GMT X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Priority: 3 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal