🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #815

Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON

#815
From: Uncle Ben
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:41
88 lines
6061 bytes
On Jan 25, 9:27 am, GSS <gurcharn_san...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 11:55 pm, maxwell <s...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 10 2009, 1:01 pm, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ......
> >>> These types of mediumless fields remind me of the grin of the Cheshire
> >>> Cat.
> >>> For the rest of us: no cat, no grin.
>
> >> Well, the "rest of us" is a rather small but cranky minority,
> >> apparently, who have difficulty when nature resists pigeonholing.
> >> Space that isn't devoid of properties, wave phenomena outside of
> >> media, objects that are neither particles nor waves, fields that
> >> aren't made of stuff, properties of objects that don't have a unique
> >> and frame-independent value, causality that doesn't require strict and
> >> time-ordered determinism -- all of these are threats to favorite
> >> comfort toys and cuddle bears that are difficult to let go of, even
> >> when it becomes plain that nature is not as simple as we thought in
> >> our cuddle-bear days.
>
> >> PD
>
> > You have that rare ability, shared by many of today's theoretical
> > physicists, to talk about logically self-contradictory concepts and
> > imagine that these contradictions actually form the basis of reality.
> > It is no surprise that modern theoretical physics is lost in
> > "Wonderland"?
> > Space = nothing AND has properties;
> > waves = variations in a medium AND in empty space;
> > fields = variation in a component of reality AND not made of anything;
> > object properties = invariant defining characteristics
> > AND values varying by viewpoint;
> > causality = invariant determinism across time AND anything goes.
>
> > No, Mr Draper, it is you who are still stuck in the nursery - the
> > childlike world where any contradiction is allowed and where logical
> > consistency is not required.
> > Time to grow up and recognize that when your ideas are so muddled and
> > contradictory, you have not created a theory of the world (physics)
> > but a self-indulgent, fools paradise, funded by gullible
> > governments.
>
> Well said 'maxwell', I agree with you.
> Yes, today's theoretical physicists do talk about logically self-
> contradictory concepts. Perhaps in the grand maze of the unknown,
> theoretical physicists have somewhere missed the right track and are
> now approaching a dead end. They have been steadily indoctrinated into
> believing that due to the  complexity of physical reality, they can
> not demand logical consistency in physical concepts and can not even
> demand mental visualization of basic phenomena in quantum mechanical
> world. In this regard let me quote from "The Farce of Physics" by
> Bryan G. Wallace.
>
> "In 1963, P. A. M. Dirac, in his paper, `The evolution of the
> physicist's picture of nature', [65] writes: `one can make a safe
> guess that uncertainty relations in their present form will not
> survive in the physics of the future'. André Mercier reports [121] a
> conversation with Werner Heisenberg, in which Heisenberg argued `that
> even major modifications of present physical theories would not
> transform them into the desired new theory, as quite different and
> novel ideas are required. Secondly, the impact of quantum theory and
> relativity theory on the minds of those scholars who helped found them
> during the first half of our century is conceivably such that they are
> imprisoned by these theories and thus cannot help but reason
> conformably, that is, in terms of traditional concepts; whereas the
> need is for a whole revolution of thought, which can only be carried
> through by nonconformists.'..."
>
> GSShttp://book.fundamentalphysics.info- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yet the facts are that in a two-slit experiment in a vacuum in which
only one electron (or photon) goes through at a time, if you leave
both slits open, you get a two-slit interference pattern on the end
screen.  If you cover up one slit, you get a one-slit pattern.  (And
if you cover both slits, you get nothing.)

These phenomena occcur whether you believe in them or not.

Ben
www.greenba.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <d933c9b2-e332-4286-ba2e-00dc1d0ce286@n31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4B1FDD30.82B80BA8@hate.spam.net> <3cb93234-aa3a-4f80-8c93-b1c5c9df9f04@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <66bdb65c-8caa-4310-9382-271350b44590@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com> <3ea2bd7c-8e94-4008-b96a-0b4ce4a7037d@u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com> <48bf679f-9003-4d4e-8b22-ba92a8604fd8@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <b609b964-123a-4fea-bd12-ab0cc6029b25@e37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <5cb5e36c-33c5-4a25-a51f-912923fb8733@f12g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,dc700a8560c18dd9
X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Uncle Ben <ben@greenba.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Subject: Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:41:01 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 88
Message-ID: <d933c9b2-e332-4286-ba2e-00dc1d0ce286@n31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>
References: <65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> 
 <4B1FDD30.82B80BA8@hate.spam.net> <3cb93234-aa3a-4f80-8c93-b1c5c9df9f04@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <66bdb65c-8caa-4310-9382-271350b44590@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>
 <3ea2bd7c-8e94-4008-b96a-0b4ce4a7037d@u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com>
 <48bf679f-9003-4d4e-8b22-ba92a8604fd8@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <b609b964-123a-4fea-bd12-ab0cc6029b25@e37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
 <5cb5e36c-33c5-4a25-a51f-912923fb8733@f12g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.252.18.227
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1264434061 20327 127.0.0.1 (25 Jan 2010 15:41:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:41:01 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.252.18.227; 
 posting-account=15T5jAkAAACpO9KgK0Ue212ywoAPQtp7
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; 
 Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30;
 MDDC; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)