🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:47:04 -0000, "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics_q>
wrote:

>
>"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message 
>news:en70j5lm9e808nrgomlcenj5sk4dmpavnh@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:03:30 -0000, "Androcles" 
>> <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics_q>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
>>>news:d6dui5lsugo526sdbf34iq1537r87gcfb7@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:25:55 -0000, "Androcles"
>>>> <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics_q>
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> The anomalies 2, 4  and 5 are pretty obvious but I cannot explain them
>>>>>> any
>>>>>> way
>>>>>> other than lensing..
>>>>>
>>>>>Hint:
>>>>>  http://www.britastro.org/vss/
>>>>>HT Cas
>>>>
>>>> That's not much of a curve.
>>>> What does it tell us?
>>>
>>>That's for you to work out.
>>
>> Two curves are shown there. .. just a couple of bits and pieces.
>> I don't understand.
>> Incidentally, Einstein derived a gravitational lensing curve that was 
>> supposed
>> to be unique and which described a star's brightness variation. See:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_microlensing#Events_yielding_the_Einstein_angle
>>
>Why are you so concerned about Einstein's gravitational microlensing
>in wackypedia?
>  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Shapiro/Crapiro.htm
>
>
>
>> It turns out that this is perfectly matched and explained by BaTh.
>
>Nobody knows what BaTh, WaSh or SoAp are. I'll enlighten them...
>SoAp is "Silly old Aussie Prick". BaTh is "Batty Aussie Theory".
>WaSh is "WilsoniA Shit".
>
>> It is just
>> the brightness curve of an orbiting star with yaw angle about 180. 
>> Periastron
>> furthest from us.
>> The BaTh match is near the top at: http://www.scisite.info/group1.jpg
>>
>The data is there, Henry Wilson, old buddy (HwOb). It's up to you to
>match it before I do. It could be too late but I'll give you a shot at it.
>(You know I've already done it, don't you?) :-)

YOUR explanation is not THE explanation. Light is bent by mass. Light is
concentrated by the lensing effect.
But the star itself must be nerly behind the planet that causes the bending.
That fits in perfectly with our c+v generated brightness curves....and ours are
the same shape as Einstein's....

Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

       Selling something that doesn't exist is a serious crime....unless it's called god.