🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #940

Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON

#940
From: PD
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:36
41 lines
3099 bytes
On Dec 9, 12:54 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The following text is consistent with Einstein's relativity theory but
> inconsistent with both Maxwell's electromagnetic theory and Newton's
> emission theory of light:
>
> http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/big_bang/ind...
> John Norton: "Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer
> were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now
> pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would
> mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to
> have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE WAVELENGTH - THE DISTANCE
> BETWEEN CRESTS - TO HAVE DECREASED)."

And this is directly confirmed in experiment.
However, it is consistent with Maxwell's electromagnetic theory; you
got that wrong.

>
> The following text is consistent with both Maxwell's electromagnetic
> theory and Newton's emission theory of light but inconsistent with
> Einstein's relativity theory:
>
> Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer were to hurry
> towards the source of the light, the observer would now pass
> wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would mean
> that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to have
> increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE SPEED OF LIGHT - TO HAVE
> INCREASED AS WELL).

And this is directly contradicted by experiment. Newton was wrong
about light.

>
> Conclusion: Either both Maxwell's electromagnetic theory and Newton's
> emission theory are wrong or Einstein's relativity theory is wrong.

Newton's theory was wrong.

>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <80c9cf25-6e2f-473d-972d-6268e825998e@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,dc700a8560c18dd9
X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: PD <thedraperfamily@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Subject: Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:36:35 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <80c9cf25-6e2f-473d-972d-6268e825998e@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: <65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.208.104.19
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1260380195 10741 127.0.0.1 (9 Dec 2009 17:36:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:36:35 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=206.208.104.19; 
 posting-account=nPH_PQkAAACneDKT6RXopPWArC2We4Rq
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) 
 Gecko/20091102  Firefox 66960903 [xSP_2:29697434dd0768330b2c9bd72f24b458_249]
  (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)