Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #940Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON
From: PD
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:36
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:36
41 lines
3099 bytes
3099 bytes
On Dec 9, 12:54 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > The following text is consistent with Einstein's relativity theory but > inconsistent with both Maxwell's electromagnetic theory and Newton's > emission theory of light: > > http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/big_bang/ind... > John Norton: "Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer > were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now > pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would > mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to > have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE WAVELENGTH - THE DISTANCE > BETWEEN CRESTS - TO HAVE DECREASED)." And this is directly confirmed in experiment. However, it is consistent with Maxwell's electromagnetic theory; you got that wrong. > > The following text is consistent with both Maxwell's electromagnetic > theory and Newton's emission theory of light but inconsistent with > Einstein's relativity theory: > > Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer were to hurry > towards the source of the light, the observer would now pass > wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would mean > that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to have > increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE SPEED OF LIGHT - TO HAVE > INCREASED AS WELL). And this is directly contradicted by experiment. Newton was wrong about light. > > Conclusion: Either both Maxwell's electromagnetic theory and Newton's > emission theory are wrong or Einstein's relativity theory is wrong. Newton's theory was wrong. > > Pentcho Valev > pva...@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<80c9cf25-6e2f-473d-972d-6268e825998e@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,dc700a8560c18dd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: PD <thedraperfamily@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique Subject: Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:36:35 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 42 Message-ID: <80c9cf25-6e2f-473d-972d-6268e825998e@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> References: <65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.208.104.19 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1260380195 10741 127.0.0.1 (9 Dec 2009 17:36:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=206.208.104.19; posting-account=nPH_PQkAAACneDKT6RXopPWArC2We4Rq User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox 66960903 [xSP_2:29697434dd0768330b2c9bd72f24b458_249] (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)