Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #943Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON
From: Tunel Vision
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:18
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:18
37 lines
3108 bytes
3108 bytes
On Dec 9, 10:05 pm, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 9, 2:59 pm, bill <cosmo...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > On Dec 10, 4:36 am, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 9, 12:54 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer were to hurry > > > > towards the source of the light, the observer would now pass > > > > wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would mean > > > > that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to have > > > > increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE SPEED OF LIGHT - TO HAVE > > > > INCREASED AS WELL). > > > > And this is directly contradicted by experiment. > > > It is my understanding that noone has, as yet, come up with an > > experiment to accurately determine one way light speed (OWLS). > > The direct measurement is not necessary. > > A combination of experimental results -- namely, a two-way light speed > measurement and measurement of the isotropy of the speed of light -- > constrains what the one-way speed of light can be. A little doodling > on the back of a cocktail napkin should convince you of that in ten > minutes or less. > > Furthermore, we DO have direct and independent measurements of > wavelength and frequency of light from distant and moving sources, and > the product of these quantities is remarkably constant at c. > > PD if light is a misunderstood phenomena, then newton easily may become right me to know, light still is a debatable phenomena
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<060138b2-1600-45ff-8e78-534c1c5573a3@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <80c9cf25-6e2f-473d-972d-6268e825998e@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <113e400b-03ae-4527-9130-93c5e8d2bad0@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <eb89c0fc-a644-4553-bda3-785003d4b374@g4g2000pri.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,dc700a8560c18dd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Tunel Vision <h38htg@dcemail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique Subject: Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:18:52 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 37 Message-ID: <060138b2-1600-45ff-8e78-534c1c5573a3@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com> References: <65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <80c9cf25-6e2f-473d-972d-6268e825998e@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <113e400b-03ae-4527-9130-93c5e8d2bad0@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <eb89c0fc-a644-4553-bda3-785003d4b374@g4g2000pri.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 221.214.27.253 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1260393533 18426 127.0.0.1 (9 Dec 2009 21:18:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=221.214.27.253; posting-account=2WP8vAoAAAAtnvnTk8FDM9J1t8VCs5N6 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 ISA2001 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)