🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #946

Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON

#946
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:57
46 lines
3536 bytes
On Dec 9, 7:36 pm, PD (Paul Draper) wrote:
> On Dec 9, 12:54 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > The following text is consistent with Einstein's relativity theory but
> > inconsistent with both Maxwell's electromagnetic theory and Newton's
> > emission theory of light:
>
> > http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/big_bang/index.html
> > John Norton: "Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer
> > were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now
> > pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would
> > mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to
> > have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE WAVELENGTH - THE DISTANCE
> > BETWEEN CRESTS - TO HAVE DECREASED)."
>
> And this is directly confirmed in experiment.
> However, it is consistent with Maxwell's electromagnetic theory; you
> got that wrong.

The problem, Clever Draper, is whether Maxwell's electromagnetic
theory predicts that the speed of light is unaffected/affected by the
movements of the observer. Consider this, Clever Draper:

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002149/01/Norton.pdf
John Norton: "The difficulty Einstein faced is that Maxwells
electrodynamics cannot be an emission theory. One of the most
important consequences of the theory is that light in a vacuum always
propagates at the same speed, c=186,000 miles per second, WITH RESPECT
TO THE ETHER. Its velocity of propagation is unaffected by the
velocity of the emitter."

Would John Norton have been right if he had written:

John Norton's text modified: "The difficulty Einstein faced is that
Maxwells electrodynamics cannot be an emission theory. One of the most
important consequences of the theory is that light in a vacuum always
propagates at the same speed, c=186,000 miles per second, WITH RESPECT
TO BOTH THE ETHER AND THE OBSERVER. Its velocity of propagation is
unaffected by the velocities of BOTH THE EMITTER AND THE OBSERVER."

Again: Clever Draper, is the speed of light unaffected/affected by the
movements of the observer according to Maxwell's electromagnetic
theory?

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3cb93234-aa3a-4f80-8c93-b1c5c9df9f04@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4B1FDD30.82B80BA8@hate.spam.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,dc700a8560c18dd9
X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Subject: Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:57:35 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <3cb93234-aa3a-4f80-8c93-b1c5c9df9f04@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
References: <65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> 
 <4B1FDD30.82B80BA8@hate.spam.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.215.201.48
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1260428255 31703 127.0.0.1 (10 Dec 2009 06:57:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:57:35 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.215.201.48; 
 posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 
 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)