🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: WHY IS VALEV UTTERLY OBSESSED WITH THIS ISSUE?
By: ukastronomy on Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:00

Re: LARGE HADRON COLLIDER AND EINSTEIN 1954 CONFESSION
By: Pentcho Valev on Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:27

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: RustyJames on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:49

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: Strich.9 on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:26

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: RustyJames on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:21

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: Strich.9 on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:05

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: Strich.9 on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:04

Re: VALEV'S BIZARRE OBSESSION
By: ukastronomy on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:46

QUANTUM GRAVITY, DIVINE EINSTEIN, DIVINE MICHELL
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:57

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: Sue... on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:27

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: Tom Roberts on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:33

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: maxwell on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:17

Re: SLIPPERY CONCEPTS IN VALEV'S MIND
By: ukastronomy on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:24

Re: SLIPPERY CONCEPTS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY
By: Strich.9 on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:56

Re: SLIPPERY CONCEPTS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY
By: Uncle Al on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:01

Re: VALEV - I'M SO SORRY BUT I CANNOT STOP POSTING THE SAME OLD MATERIAL!
By: Strich.9 on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:20

SLIPPERY CONCEPTS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:04

VALEV - I'M SO SORRY BUT I CANNOT STOP POSTING THE SAME OLD MATERIAL!
By: ukastronomy on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:21

Re: EINSTEINIANS AND OTHER PHYSICISTS
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:18

Re: DEDUCTIVE SCIENCE: CRITERIA OF REFUTATION
By: PD on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:55

Re: EINSTEINIANS AND OTHER PHYSICISTS
By: PD on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:04

Re: DEDUCTIVE SCIENCE: CRITERIA OF REFUTATION
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:52

Re: EINSTEINIANS AND OTHER PHYSICISTS
By: xxein on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:08

Re: EINSTEINIANS AND OTHER PHYSICISTS
By: Uncle Al on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:19

Re: EINSTEINIANS AND OTHER PHYSICISTS
By: RustyJames on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:32

Re: EINSTEINIANS AND OTHER PHYSICISTS
By: Strich.9 on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:04

Re: EINSTEINIANS AND OTHER PHYSICISTS
By: Bruce Richmond on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:46

Re: EINSTEINIANS AND OTHER PHYSICISTS
By: Strich.9 on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:37

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: Strich.9 on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:04

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: maxwell on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:00

Re: EINSTEINIANS AND OTHER PHYSICISTS
By: Uncle Al on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:03

Re: DEDUCTIVE SCIENCE: CRITERIA OF REFUTATION
By: gabydewilde on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:42

Valev has a friend - however he might not be too thrilled at who it is!
By: ukastronomy on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:18

Re: 100 percent Der Kommissar, inquiring on matters of state and institution. Crimes against humanity. Humanity declares crimes ...
By: gb on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:44

Re: The UK invented following people with CCTV cameras allowing use of home television and remote control to switch between netw...
By: gb on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:40

Re: Valev is Nobel Prize level. Now you want to be Nobel Prize level Der Kommissar from systematic Kommissar-land UK of world fi...
By: gb on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:27

Re: Valev is about a Nobel Prize winner. Live it alone UK copper Der Kommissar CCTV kind. I'll follow you. Equation is you class...
By: gb on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:22

Re: Why are you after Nobel Prize level people Der Kommissar? Round and round? Did you just wake op you have a UK polizei mother...
By: gb on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:14

Re: EINSTEINIANS AND OTHER PHYSICISTS
By: gabydewilde on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:10

VALEV'S BIZARRE OBSESSION
By: ukastronomy on Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:41

Re: QUANTUM GRAVITY, DIVINE EINSTEIN, DIVINE MICHELL
By: Pentcho Valev on Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:22

Re: VALEV NEEDS A SCIENTIFIC BRAIN (IMPLANT?)
By: ukastronomy on Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:46

EVEN STRING THEORISTS NEED A SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION
By: Pentcho Valev on Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:00

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: Strich.9 on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:17

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: Strich.9 on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:15

Re: Muon Decay Experiments
By: Tom Roberts on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:01

Re: POPPER, TRUTH, FANATICISM
By: Pentcho Valev on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:29

Re: DEDUCTIVE SCIENCE: CRITERIA OF REFUTATION
By: John Kennaugh on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:03

POPPER, TRUTH, FANATICISM
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:44

Re: HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: Fripounette on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:21

Re: HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: Koobee Wublee on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:34

Re: HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: Darwin123 on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:20

Re: Beyond relativity and quantum mechanics
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:18

Re: HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: Koobee Wublee on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:51

Re: HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: hhc314 on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:15

Re: HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:20

Re: HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: RustyJames on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:15

Re: HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: Sue... on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:44

Re: PERIMETER INSTITUTE: THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC METHOD
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:35

Re: HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: Koobee Wublee on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:32

Re: HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:49

Re: VALEV'S BIZARRE OBSESSION
By: Andrew Usher on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:38

Re: HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: Darwin123 on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:30

Re: The job of a Der Kommissar is to enquire about matter of state and institution and not give up on that. UK is full of instit...
By: gb on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:51

THERE IS NO SCIENCE IN VALEV "METHOD"
By: ukastronomy on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:25

Re: PERIMETER INSTITUTE: THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC METHOD
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:14

THERE IS NO SCIENCE IN VALEV "METHOD"
By: ukastronomy on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:14

PERIMETER INSTITUTE: THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC METHOD
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:51

Re: VALEV NEEDS A SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION - NOT SOCK PUPPETS!
By: Koobee Wublee on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:41

VALEV NEEDS A SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION - NOT SOCK PUPPETS!
By: ukastronomy on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:31

HENRI POINCARE PARTIALLY REHABILITATED
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:14

Re: EVEN STRING THEORISTS NEED A SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION
By: zzbunker on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:04

Re: EVEN STRING THEORISTS NEED A SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION
By: gabydewilde on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:21

Re: VALEV NEEDS A SCIENTIFIC BRAIN (IMPLANT?)
By: Sam Wormley on Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:40

Re: VALEV NEEDS A SCIENTIFIC BRAIN (IMPLANT?)
By: Stamenin on Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:36

Re: BEWITCHED PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
By: PD on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:41

Re: BEWITCHED PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
By: maxwell on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:11

Re: REMARKABLE BIRD, RELATIVITY! BEAUTIFUL PLUMAGE!
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:54

Re: BEWITCHED PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:21

EINSTEINIANA: TIME DOES NOT SIT WELL WITH RELATIVITY
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:54

Re: ARE POPPER'S BASIC STATEMENTS CAMOUFLAGE?
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:48

Re: NEITHER CRAZY NOR MISGUIDED EINSTEINIAN
By: Igor on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:06

NEITHER CRAZY NOR MISGUIDED EINSTEINIAN
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:47

BEWITCHED PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:59

Re: ARE POPPER'S BASIC STATEMENTS CAMOUFLAGE?
By: xxein on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:26

Re: ARE POPPER'S BASIC STATEMENTS CAMOUFLAGE?
By: Y.Porat on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:13

ARE POPPER'S BASIC STATEMENTS CAMOUFLAGE?
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:42

Re: EINSTEINIANA: THE REVOLUTION THAT DID NOT TAKE PLACE
By: Strich.9 on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:49

EINSTEINIANA: THE REVOLUTION THAT DID NOT TAKE PLACE
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:13

PHILOSOPHERS DEVELOP THE CONCEPT OF TIME
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:11

Re: Perimeter conference on black holes and quantum physics with recorded talks
By: gb on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:01

Science too difficult in the UK
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:05

Re: NEITHER CRAZY NOR MISGUIDED EINSTEINIAN
By: Xaustein on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:15

Re: BEWITCHED PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
By: Xaustein on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:12

Re: BEWITCHED PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
By: Pentcho Valev on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:05

Re: Perimeter conference on black holes and quantum physics with recorded talks
By: Pentcho Valev on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:52

Re: BEWITCHED PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
By: Eric Gisse on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:54

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: NoEinstein on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:57

SCIENCE LIKE DEMOCRACY
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:20

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:39

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: PD on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:16

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:05

Re: Interpreting the Pound-Rebka experiment in 1911
By: Sue... on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:23

Re: Interpreting the Pound-Rebka experiment in 1911
By: FLASH on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:47

Re: Interpreting the Pound-Rebka experiment in 1911
By: Uncle Al on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:03

Re: Interpreting the Pound-Rebka experiment in 1911
By: Strich.9 on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:37

Re: Interpreting the Pound-Rebka experiment in 1911
By: Sue... on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:18

Re: Interpreting the Pound-Rebka experiment in 1911
By: Strich.9 on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:07

Re: Interpreting the Pound-Rebka experiment in 1911
By: Sue... on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:37

Interpreting the Pound-Rebka experiment in 1911
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:25

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Dirk Van de moortel on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:25

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: PD on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:32

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Koobee Wublee on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:29

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Uncle Al on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:26

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Androcles on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:21

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Dirk Van de moortel on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:20

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Dirk Van de moortel on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:18

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Koobee Wublee on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:17

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Tom Roberts on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:59

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: hhc314 on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:58

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Dono on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:55

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Androcles on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:15

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:31

Re: Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: SolomonW on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:57

Interpreting the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:22

Re: PHILOSOPHERS DEVELOP THE CONCEPT OF TIME
By: Strich.9 on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:54

Re: HUMILIATED EINSTEINIANS
By: BradGuth on Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:24

Re: EINSTEINIANA: THE REVOLUTION THAT DID NOT TAKE PLACE
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:26