🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #1091

Re: Photon Vs. PHOTON

#1091
From: John Whitmore
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 07:02
23 lines
1589 bytes
In article <l81lk0INNdu4@pollux.usc.edu> srobiner@pollux.usc.edu (Steven Robiner) writes:
>I think I've heard that if a photon hits an electron, it
>is absorbed (assuming it's off the right energy level), and
>the electron will recoil a bit, correct?

	No.  Free electron/photon collisions can only conserve energy
and momentum in a kind of elastic collision (Compton scattering).
A bound electron can have an 'energy level', but it's more a collision
between a photon and an ATOM in that case.  The atom recoils, not
the individual electron (which is constrained so that it is not
free to recoil).

>But what happens when a photon hits another photon?  Do they
>bounce off each other, or pass right through each other?

	They pass through each other, unless some material substance
is involved (which can complicate the matter by having a nonlinear
response...optical switches can be made that work this way).
That's what one expects; the light wave is an electric disturbance,
and will apply force on a charged particle (electron), but NOT
on an uncharged particle (like a photon).

	John Whitmore
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Aug11.070222.6867@u.washington.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!milton.u.washington.edu!whit
References: <l81lk0INNdu4@pollux.usc.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!milton.u.washington.edu!whit
From: whit@milton.u.washington.edu (John Whitmore)
Subject: Re: Photon Vs. PHOTON
Message-ID: <1992Aug11.070222.6867@u.washington.edu>
Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
References: <l81lk0INNdu4@pollux.usc.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 07:02:22 GMT
Lines: 26