🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 5, 7:49�pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Aug 5, 1:38 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:b869657a-8ad3-4d4d-9f10-5440569a3345@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >>> On Aug 4, 10:01 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 4, 3:54 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>news:147d2d46-ff33-4aac-b29a-7e24af243840@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:56 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 4:29 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:12?am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rbwi...@juno.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up your claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a Bible. ?There's no evidence in there to back up your
> >>>>>>>>>>>> claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>> John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled
> >>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>> fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith
> >>>>>>>>>>> unto
> >>>>>>>>>>> them, Peace be unto you.
> >>>>>>>>>>> John 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire
> >>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>> coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now
> >>>>>>>>>>> caught.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great
> >>>>>>>>>>> fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so
> >>>>>>>>>>> many, yet was not the net broken.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the disciples
> >>>>>>>>>>> durst
> >>>>>>>>>>> ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 13 Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and
> >>>>>>>>>>> fish
> >>>>>>>>>>> likewise.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 14 This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his
> >>>>>>>>>>> disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
> >>>>>>>>>> The Bible still is not evidence. I asked for evidence.- Hide
> >>>>>>>>>> quoted
> >>>>>>>>>> text -
> >>>>>>>>> The Bible is accepted as evidence in court.
> >>>>>>>> For what kinds of cases?
> >>>>>>> For all kinds of cases. Clarence Darrow had the Bible entered as
> >>>>>>> evidence in the monkey trial.
> >>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>>>> All kinds if cases?
> >>>>>> You mean, "one type of case"?
> >>>>> No, a lawyer can attempt to introduce any physical object as evidence
> >>>>> in a court case.
> >>>> But, will it be ACCEPTED as evidence?
> >>>> You keep trying these clever games with your debating tactics. Clever,
> >>>> to you. Lame and flimsy to everyone else.
> >>> Not today. A judge today in the United States will not even allow the
> >>> Constitution of the United States to be entered as evidence.
> >>> Robert B. Winn
> >> It depends on what you are trying to prove.
> >> Why were you trying to introduce the Constitution as evidence, and how could
> >> it prove or disprove anything in relation to your particular circumstabces?
>
> >> --
> > The sixth amendment to the Constitution says that the defendant has
> > the right to trial by jury in "all criminal prosecutions". � The judge
> > in my case had just denied my right to trial by jury.
>
> Then you can appeal.
>
I do appeal every time I am denied trial by jury.
Robert B. Winn