🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 6, 12:27 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 1:38 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
>
> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:b869657a-8ad3-4d4d-9f10-5440569a3345@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > On Aug 4, 10:01 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > >> rbwinn wrote:
> > >> > On Aug 4, 3:54 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
> > >> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>
> > >> >>news:147d2d46-ff33-4aac-b29a-7e24af243840@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > >> >>> On Aug 3, 8:56 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > >> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > >> >>>>> On Aug 3, 4:29 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com>
> > >> >>>>>> wrote
> > >> >>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> > >> >>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:12?am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> <rbwi...@juno.com>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> ...
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up your claim.
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one.
> > >> >>>>>>>> I have a Bible. ?There's no evidence in there to back up your
> > >> >>>>>>>> claim.
> > >> >>>>>>> John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of
> > >> >>>>>>> the
> > >> >>>>>>> week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled
> > >> >>>>>>> for
> > >> >>>>>>> fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith
> > >> >>>>>>> unto
> > >> >>>>>>> them, Peace be unto you.
> > >> >>>>>>> John 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire
> > >> >>>>>>> of
> > >> >>>>>>> coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
> > >> >>>>>>> 10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now
> > >> >>>>>>> caught.
> > >> >>>>>>> 11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great
> > >> >>>>>>> fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so
> > >> >>>>>>> many, yet was not the net broken.
> > >> >>>>>>> 12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the disciples
> > >> >>>>>>> durst
> > >> >>>>>>> ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord.
> > >> >>>>>>> 13 Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and
> > >> >>>>>>> fish
> > >> >>>>>>> likewise.
> > >> >>>>>>> 14 This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his
> > >> >>>>>>> disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
> > >> >>>>>> The Bible still is not evidence. I asked for evidence.- Hide
> > >> >>>>>> quoted
> > >> >>>>>> text -
> > >> >>>>> The Bible is accepted as evidence in court.
> > >> >>>> For what kinds of cases?
> > >> >>> For all kinds of cases. Clarence Darrow had the Bible entered as
> > >> >>> evidence in the monkey trial.
> > >> >>> Robert B. Winn
> > >> >> All kinds if cases?
> > >> >> You mean, "one type of case"?
>
> > >> > No, a lawyer can attempt to introduce any physical object as evidence
> > >> > in a court case.
>
> > >> But, will it be ACCEPTED as evidence?
>
> > >> You keep trying these clever games with your debating tactics. Clever,
> > >> to you. Lame and flimsy to everyone else.
>
> > > Not today. A judge today in the United States will not even allow the
> > > Constitution of the United States to be entered as evidence.
> > > Robert B. Winn
>
> > It depends on what you are trying to prove.
> > Why were you trying to introduce the Constitution as evidence, and how could
> > it prove or disprove anything in relation to your particular circumstabces?
>
> > --
>
> The sixth amendment to the Constitution says that the defendant has
> the right to trial by jury in "all criminal prosecutions".   The judge
> in my case had just denied my right to trial by jury.
> Robert B. Winn

Probably to minimise the number of people that will need trauma
counselling from trying to follow your gibberish before they realise
it's complete gibberish.

Al