🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 5, 9:30 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Aug 4, 9:22 pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 5, 11:08 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 4, 5:34 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
> > > > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 05:02:25 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism
> > > > rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> > > > <df36fbb3-4bc6-4217-93a7-eb8537d50...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>:
>
> > > > >On Aug 3, 8:56?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > > > >> rbwinn wrote:
> > > > >> > On Aug 3, 4:29 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > > > >> >> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> > > > >> >> in alt.atheism:
>
> > > > >> >>> On Aug 3, 8:12?am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>> On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> > > > >> >>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> > > > >> >>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>> ...
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection.
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there?
> > > > >> >>>>>>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of the
> > > > >> >>>>>>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions.
> > > > >> >>>>>> No evidence backs up your claim.
> > > > >> >>>>> Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one.
> > > > >> >>>> I have a Bible. ?There's no evidence in there to back up your claim.
> > > > >> >>> John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the
> > > > >> >>> week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for
> > > > >> >>> fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto
> > > > >> >>> them, Peace be unto you.
> > > > >> >>> John 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of
> > > > >> >>> coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
> > > > >> >>> 10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now
> > > > >> >>> caught.
> > > > >> >>> 11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great
> > > > >> >>> fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so
> > > > >> >>> many, yet was not the net broken.
> > > > >> >>> 12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the disciples durst
> > > > >> >>> ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord.
> > > > >> >>> 13 Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish
> > > > >> >>> likewise.
> > > > >> >>> 14 This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his
> > > > >> >>> disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
> > > > >> >> The Bible still is not evidence. I asked for evidence.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > >> > The Bible is accepted as evidence in court. ?
>
> > > > >> For what kinds of cases?
>
> > > > >For any kind of case. A lawyer can request that a Bible be entered as
> > > > >evidence in any court case. Clarence Darrow had the Bible entered as
> > > > >evidence in the famous "monkey trial".
>
> > > > When did you last check the rules of evidence?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > The last time I was in court. I attempted to introduce the
> > > Constitution of the United States as evidence.
> > > Robert B. Winn
>
> > Yes, the constitution was written in modern time and is not a story.
> > The bible was written more than 2000 years ago and was a collection of
> > tales meant to con the young into sleep.
> > You do not know the significance of a constitution and a fictional
> > story book.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I said I attempted to enter the Constitution as evidence.  Judges in
> America today do not allow the Constitution in their police state
> courts.
> Robert B. Winn

Are you try to lie?
Any one can introduce the Constitution as evidence, but this must be
done by the lawyer.
And you should know that the judges have much more knowledge in the
Constitution than any one else?
If he refuse your lawyer's request, he must have seen the
irrelevance.
And you lied again that the courts are police state court.