🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Aug 4, 9:36�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> On Aug 4, 9:40 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 3, 8:38 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 3, 4:18 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:12 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection.
>>>>>>>>>>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there?
>>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of the
>>>>>>>>>>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions.
>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up your claim.
>>>>>>>>> Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one.
>>>>>>>> I have a Bible. There's no evidence in there to back up your claim.
>>>>>>> John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the
>>>>>>> week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for
>>>>>>> fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto
>>>>>>> them, Peace be unto you.
>>>>>>> John 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of
>>>>>>> coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
>>>>>>> 10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now
>>>>>>> caught.
>>>>>>> 11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great
>>>>>>> fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so
>>>>>>> many, yet was not the net broken.
>>>>>>> 12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the disciples durst
>>>>>>> ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord.
>>>>>>> 13 Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish
>>>>>>> likewise.
>>>>>>> 14 This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his
>>>>>>> disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
>>>>>> No, that's not evidence. That's a claim.
>>>>> Well, you have to understand something about rules of evidence. If
>>>>> something exists, it can be entered into evidence. The Bible
>>>>> exists.
>>>> This post exists. This post says that unicorns exist. Therefore, this
>>>> post can be entered into evidence and unicorns must exist. Right?
>>>> Or is "unicorns exist" just a claim?
>>> No, it is evidence that you are not telling the truth.
>>>>> So what is your position, that the Bible does not exist, therefore it
>>>>> cannot be entered into evidence?
>>>>> This is the same tactic you have used from the beginning concerning
>>>>> Hezekiah's tunnel.
>>>> Um, no. And you cannot prove that any atheist has ever said anything
>>>> about Hezekiah's tunnel not existing, so you might as well give up that
>>>> tripe.
>>> One atheist a few years back said that Hezekiah's tunnel was a hoax
>>> perpetrated by Jerusalem tour guides.
>>> Robert B. Winn
>> And none in this discussion and no citation to back up this claim.
>> And yet you ascribe all atheists with the property of denying tunnel
>> exists.
>> Why is that? �Could it be that you're another Liar-for-jesus?
>>
>> Al- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> 
> No, it is just that knowing the way atheists are,

You have shown time and again that you have NO knowledge of the way 
atheists really are.

> if an atheist tells
> me that he believes the tunnel exists, I do not believe that atheist
> is really conceding its existence, but will continue to say that the
> Bible is nothing but mythology even after being shown that it is not.

Why?  Because the tunnel exists?

-- 
****************************************************
*          DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226          *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* Can God create a Thai dish so spicy that even He *
* can't eat it?                                    *
****************************************************