🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 5, 6:35 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Aug 3, 8:57 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>
> > rbwinn wrote:
> > > On Aug 3, 4:30 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > >> rbwinn wrote:
> > >>> On Aug 3, 8:54 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > >>>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 07:50:37 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> > >>>> in alt.atheism:
> > >>>>> On Aug 2, 7:23?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> The word in question is "egkuos". This word can be defined as:
> > >>>>>>>> swelling inside, i.e. pregnant -- great with child.
> > >>>>>>>> You are using "great with child" and assuming that's what the writer of
> > >>>>>>>> Luke meant. Not sure how you get that, actually. Most people today
> > >>>>>>>> would use the word "pregnant", not the phrase "great with child".
> > >>>>>>> Well, what you are saying is that you believe that Luke was so feeble
> > >>>>>>> minded that he would have believed there was something other than a
> > >>>>>>> child in the womb of a pregnant woman. ? Nothing he wrote would
> > >>>>>>> indicate that he was feeble minded.
> > >>>>>> No, I'm not saying that at all.
> > >>>>> Well, you absolutely are. You regard me as so stupid that you think
> > >>>>> you can convince me that a pregnant woman does not have a child in her
> > >>>>> womb. Why would you treat Luke any different?
> > >>>> Once again, you misrepresent the discussion.- Hide quoted text -
> > >>>> - Show quoted text -
> > >>> The discussion was whether a pregnant woman has a child in her womb.
> > >>> You claimed she did not.
> > >> There is a fetus in the womb from 9 weeks from conception to birth.
> > >> Prior to 9 weeks, there isn't even a fetus.
>
> > >> Did you parents ever teach you about the birds and the bees? (Hint: It
> > >> has nothing to do with avians or insects.)
>
> > > I was taught from the time I was born that a pregnant woman has a
> > > child inside her.
>
> > Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but you were taught wrong.
>
> > --
>
> You are saying that my mother was lying to me about my younger
> brothers and sisters?
> Robert B. Winn

A child is of a few years old......and your brothers and sisters were
a few years old in your mother's womb?
Your mother was not lying but was not conscious/careful of what she
said and of course wrong.