Article View: sci.physics
Article #1117Re: Super Conducting Supercollider
From: Cameron Randale Bass
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 14:59
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 14:59
18 lines
1349 bytes
1349 bytes
In article <5012@tuegate.tue.nl> johan@blade.stack.urc.tue.nl (Johan Wevers) writes:
>Despite of the whole discussion about what the possible spin-of results
>from the SSC would be, I think that the main task of SSC - the increase
>of our knowledge about *FUNDAMENTAL* physical laws (not the low- energy
>approximations used in, e.g. condensed matter physics) is so important
>that it's worth building SSC. It can't be done with a cheaper machine,
>so we need SSC.
Spurious logic.
How much is too much?
dale bass
--
C. R. Bass crb7q@virginia.edu
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia (804) 924-7926
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug11.145954.25130@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7qReferences:
<85799@netnews.upenn.edu> <1992Aug10.220817.2983@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <5012@tuegate.tue.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7q From: crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Super Conducting Supercollider Message-ID: <1992Aug11.145954.25130@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Date: 11 Aug 92 14:59:54 GMT References: <85799@netnews.upenn.edu> <1992Aug10.220817.2983@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <5012@tuegate.tue.nl> Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: University of Virginia Lines: 18