🚀 go-pugleaf

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message 
news:12cee822-56d1-443e-a35f-942ba19102c7@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 3, 8:57?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Aug 3, 4:30 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Aug 3, 8:54 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 07:50:37 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> 
> >>>> wrote
> >>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>> On Aug 2, 7:23?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>> The word in question is "egkuos". This word can be defined as:
> >>>>>>>> swelling inside, i.e. pregnant -- great with child.
> >>>>>>>> You are using "great with child" and assuming that's what the 
> >>>>>>>> writer of
> >>>>>>>> Luke meant. Not sure how you get that, actually. Most people 
> >>>>>>>> today
> >>>>>>>> would use the word "pregnant", not the phrase "great with child".
> >>>>>>> Well, what you are saying is that you believe that Luke was so 
> >>>>>>> feeble
> >>>>>>> minded that he would have believed there was something other than 
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>> child in the womb of a pregnant woman. ? Nothing he wrote would
> >>>>>>> indicate that he was feeble minded.
> >>>>>> No, I'm not saying that at all.
> >>>>> Well, you absolutely are. You regard me as so stupid that you think
> >>>>> you can convince me that a pregnant woman does not have a child in 
> >>>>> her
> >>>>> womb. Why would you treat Luke any different?
> >>>> Once again, you misrepresent the discussion.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>> The discussion was whether a pregnant woman has a child in her womb.
> >>> You claimed she did not.
> >> There is a fetus in the womb from 9 weeks from conception to birth.
> >> Prior to 9 weeks, there isn't even a fetus.
>
> >> Did you parents ever teach you about the birds and the bees? (Hint: It
> >> has nothing to do with avians or insects.)
>
> > I was taught from the time I was born that a pregnant woman has a
> > child inside her.
>
> Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but you were taught wrong.
>
> --
Well, that is about the most feeble-minded response I have ever seen.

==========

You don't read your own posts, do you?