🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 3, 2:21 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Aug 2, 9:38 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:14:24 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> > in alt.atheism:
>
> > >On Aug 1, 3:35?pm, Matthew Johnson <matthew_mem...@newsguy.org> wrote:
> > >> In article <e41a1737-acad-4cdc-ae31-4f6523f32...@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> > >> rbwinn says...
>
> > >> >So what exactly is it
> > >> >that you are trying to do?
> > >> >Robert B. Winn
>
> > >> I could ask you the same question, Robert. All you are doing is rattling cages.
> > >> You aren't actually accomplishing anything else.
>
> > >> Worse yet, you are still crossposting. You posted this to all of the following
> > >> groups, whether you know it or not:
> > >> sci.physics,cam.misc,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism.
>
> > >> Crossposting is always irritating, so it is almost never the right thing to do.
> > >> It certainly isn't right here. Pick one group and stick with it. Pick one where
> > >> it is on topic.
>
> > >> Finally, make sure you know how to use your news client. Do you know how to coax
> > >> it to display all the groups it is about to post to? Do you know how to turn OFF
> > >> crossposting?
>
> > >Well, scientists were all done talking to me about the theory of
> > >relativity two years ago when I finally figured out how the Galilean
> > >transformation equations describe relativity of time If any
> > >scientists decide they want to talk to me, I would certainly rather
> > >talk to them than these atheists.
>
> > You already demonstrated to us how confused you are in that area.
> > Please, don't bring it up again. Didn't you learn anything from those
> > who critiqued your 'work'?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>                                x'=x-vt
>                                 y'=y
>                                 z'=z
>                                 t'=t
>
>                    w=velocity of light
>                          x=wt
>                           x'=wn'
>
>                          x'=x-vt
>                          wn' = wt -vt
>                           n'=t(1-v/w)
>
>      w = x/t = x'/n' = (x-vt)/(t-vt/w) = (x-vt)/(t-vx/w^2)
>            = (x-vt)gamma/(t-vx/c^2)gamma
>             = x'Lorentz/t'Lorentz
>
>  Robert B. Winn

What are these nonsense?
If you want to put forward any formula, be very clear about every step
and what do they mean.
There is no head and no tail to the above, and certainly nothing in
between.
Do you see any physicist respond to you?