🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #11248

Re: Does God need to prove He exists?

#11248
From: hhyapster
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:42
111 lines
8632 bytes
On Aug 3, 10:56 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Aug 2, 7:28 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>
> > rbwinn wrote:
> > > On Aug 2, 4:22 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > >> rbwinn wrote:
> > >>> On Aug 2, 9:51 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > >>>>> On Aug 1, 7:33 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On Aug 1, 6:48 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:48:10 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> > >>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> > >>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 9:07?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>>>news:6feg2oFb88s6U1@mid.individual.net...
> > >>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>>>>news:03071fc3-e432-49b6-a4a5-c22bd4a879ab@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 9:45?pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 10:47 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 1:19 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 12:11 am, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 9:59 am, "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:85ce5d7c-67c2-4090-8fd1-14d9b48f203d@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are only two commandments in the Law of Christ:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Love the Lord thy God, Love thy neighbor as thyself.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ========
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, but I draw the line at giving my neighbour hand jobs.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (as he will no doubt be relieved to hear).
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone who engages in homosexuality does not love the other
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since he is contributing to that person's damnation.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up this silly claim.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you take it up with Einstein when he returns, that idea
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing to do with me.- Hide quoted text -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would Einstein be interested in homosexuality?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would Jesus?- Hide quoted text -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All homosexuals will be judged by Jesus, the same as with sinners of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any kind.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't we just wait for him before judging them then?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I happen to think that if anyone needs judging it is the liars and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrites. ?But you don't see me campaigning to remove their human
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> rights.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yes, I do. ? Like other atheists you campaign for abortion,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> which removes the right to live of the people who are killed.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Stop being such an idiot.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Why do you equate atheism with pro-abortionism?
> > >>>>>>>>>>> They are not the same thing.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> You have already been corrected in your mistaken belief that all atheists
> > >>>>>>>>>>> are pro-abortion, so why do you insist on lying?
> > >>>>>>>>>> We may be (and I am) pro-choice, but none, AFAIK, are pro-abortion.
> > >>>>>>>>> Pro-choice today is used interchangably with pro-abortion.
> > >>>>>>>> Only by liars, particularly the liars who call themselves pro-life, but
> > >>>>>>>> prove by their politics that they love killing people.
> > >>>>>>>>> You are
> > >>>>>>>>> not pro-choice because you are opposed to the choices that would be
> > >>>>>>>>> made by any children killed by abortion.
> > >>>>>>>> Children are not killed by abortion.- Hide quoted text -
> > >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> > >>>>>>> Well, here we are at another word besides gay that atheists are trying
> > >>>>>>> to change the meaning of. Fortunately for Christian people, we have
> > >>>>>>> the Bible.
> > >>>>>>> Luke 2:4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of
> > >>>>>>> Nazareth, into Judea, unto the city of David, which is called
> > >>>>>>> Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)
> > >>>>>>> 5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.
> > >>>>>>> So do you really think you are going to be able to change the meaning?
> > >>>>>> Yes. We're not going to allow you to change the meaning of the word
> > >>>>>> "child" to mean anything from fertilization on.
> > >>>>> Well, take a good look at verse five. That was not written by me. It
> > >>>>> was written by a physician .
> > >>>> Verse 5....in which translation?
> > >>>> Hint: Luke was not written in English.
> > >>> It means the same in Greek as it does in English.
> > >> Yes. It doesn't say anything about "child". It says " (egkuos)".
> > >> Egkuos means pregnant.
>
> > > So you are saying that Luke as a physician was so ignorant that he
> > > could not tell that a pregnant woman was with child?
>
> > Luke didn't write the Gospel of Luke, numbnuts.
>
> > Secondly, "with child" is not a medical term. It is a colloquialism.
> > Are you seriously suggesting that, since some people call being pregnant
> > being "with child", that that means that there is a child in the womb?
>
> > I was at the store today and I heard a wife call her husband a "honey
> > bunny". Does that mean that husband is lapine in nature and is covered
> > in the thick processed pollen of flowers?
>
> So you say you were convinced that a pregnant woman does not have a
> child in her womb because a woman at the store called her husband
> honey bunny.  What you probably will want to do is to find someone who
> reads a lot of Harry Potter books and tell that person about your
> experience.  Since I read the Bible, it just does not have the same
> effect on me.
> Robert B. Winn

Yes, you read bible and you don't listen to "Thou shall not lie...."
And by saying that you absolutely speak for your god, you are lying
all the time.
What sort of x'tian are you?
 A lying x'tian....right?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <0aa80726-b3a5-4064-b9ce-fe853653a620@r35g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r35g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <48843687.7030204@paradise.net.nz> <03071fc3-e432-49b6-a4a5-c22bd4a879ab@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <6feg2oFb88s6U1@mid.individual.net> <UZvkk.130007$Eo3.48387@newsfe14.ams2> <8b62de28-c869-456e-9bb3-3e31ac0c6cec@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <105694psoplini9tcjnrp656b3n5lemtna@4ax.com> <ad9e7677-3f7f-40b8-bf72-d2c86f85785e@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <K9edncf9eLwNWg7VnZ2dnUVZ_sHinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <fe3546e3-46f8-4d28-bf5c-915815b13f75@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <8cCdnT09N7UWDQnVnZ2dnUVZ_ojinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <a64ee827-fd79-44a9-bc34-df8341acc860@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com> <RM2dnUyr5ozecQnVnZ2dnUVZ_q_inZ2d@speakeasy.net> <c79086af-f61f-402b-9c00-86d0a283b1a0@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <r8udneW-7P1FigjVnZ2dnUVZ_oLinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <5fc905b6-61b1-4d69-99a1-e738764effdf@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,d932fee6d9806ab9
X-Google-Thread: 102f53,dac8026861d35fee
X-Google-Thread: f442a,d932fee6d9806ab9
X-Google-Thread: 116469,d932fee6d9806ab9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid102f53,gidf442a,gid116469,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r35g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: hhyapster@gmail.com
Newsgroups: sci.physics,cam.misc,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 23:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 111
Message-ID: <0aa80726-b3a5-4064-b9ce-fe853653a620@r35g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
References: <48843687.7030204@paradise.net.nz> <03071fc3-e432-49b6-a4a5-c22bd4a879ab@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> 
 <6feg2oFb88s6U1@mid.individual.net> <UZvkk.130007$Eo3.48387@newsfe14.ams2>
 <8b62de28-c869-456e-9bb3-3e31ac0c6cec@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <105694psoplini9tcjnrp656b3n5lemtna@4ax.com> <ad9e7677-3f7f-40b8-bf72-d2c86f85785e@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
 <K9edncf9eLwNWg7VnZ2dnUVZ_sHinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <fe3546e3-46f8-4d28-bf5c-915815b13f75@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
 <8cCdnT09N7UWDQnVnZ2dnUVZ_ojinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <a64ee827-fd79-44a9-bc34-df8341acc860@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>
 <RM2dnUyr5ozecQnVnZ2dnUVZ_q_inZ2d@speakeasy.net> <c79086af-f61f-402b-9c00-86d0a283b1a0@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
 <r8udneW-7P1FigjVnZ2dnUVZ_oLinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <5fc905b6-61b1-4d69-99a1-e738764effdf@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 58.10.27.136
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217832120 8684 127.0.0.1 (4 Aug 2008 06:42:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 06:42:00 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r35g2000prm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=58.10.27.136; 
 posting-account=NPLTlAoAAADnbGreKf-CrqgPY_0uVbLS
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) 
 Gecko/20080702 Firefox/2.0.0.16,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)