Article View: sci.physics
Article #1125Re: CONSCIOUSNESS AND SCIENCE DISCUSSION GROUP
From: Cameron Randale Bass
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 16:25
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 16:25
40 lines
2717 bytes
2717 bytes
In article <1992Aug11.155741.16959@sei.cmu.edu> firth@sei.cmu.edu (Robert Firth) writes:
>In article <1992Aug11.143846.24840@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) writes:
>
>> This certainly was not dogmatic. It was simply the recognition
>> that the 'great currents' idea seems to be held in common by
>> both Marx and the previous poster. I believe that the 'great
>> currents' idea has pretty much fallen by the wayside in
>> Economics (though there are always holdouts).
>
>The idea is a lot older than Marx, of course. Its modern economist
>exponent is Kondratieff, whose exposition was considered sufficiently
>unmarxist to earn him a long paid vacation in Siberia.
The 'great current' of authoritarian dictatorship often ran
stronger than the 'great current' of ideology.
>One dividing line that splits the "great currents" people into two
>camps is the issue whether the currents are linear or cyclic. Marx
>and the Victorians believed in linear, irreversible progress, as do
>modern liberals. The other camp, from Giambattista Vico through to
>Spengler, believe in cycles - for each flow, there is an ebb.
>
>Kondratieff thought that the motive force for each cycle ("long wave"
>in his terms) was the application of new discoveries to human
>society; in other words, technology - which perhaps links this
>thread to the discussion on sci.physics of big science and its
>spin-offs.
True enough. However, I still am very skeptical of 'great currents'
linking science and society, other than in the most obvious
manner (say, the fact that a scientist might not have enough
food might affect his work, and, say, the development of something
like the theory behind semiconductors might affect society).
dale bass
--
C. R. Bass crb7q@virginia.edu
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia (804) 924-7926
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug11.162559.26624@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7qReferences:
<1992Aug11.025306.26510@panix.com> <1992Aug11.143846.24840@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Aug11.155741.16959@sei.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7q From: crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) Subject: Re: CONSCIOUSNESS AND SCIENCE DISCUSSION GROUP Message-ID: <1992Aug11.162559.26624@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: University of Virginia References: <1992Aug11.025306.26510@panix.com> <1992Aug11.143846.24840@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Aug11.155741.16959@sei.cmu.edu> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 16:25:59 GMT Lines: 40