🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 4, 2:56 am, Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...@swbell.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 11:32:47 -0700, ben_dolan_...@reet.com (Ben Dolan)
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> So, you were a killer, helping with a tool that was used to
> >>>>>> destroy people.
>
> >>>>> Well, no, it was used to save the lives of pilots. ?A lot of them
> >>>>> would have died if I had not been keeping the radar working.
>
> >>>> Pilots who ended up on bombing raids?
>
> >>> Pilots who were bombing North Vietnam every day.
>
> >> So, you admit to helping destroyers of human life.
>
> >"I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning..."
>
> >So indeed he is, by his own admission, a murderer of innocent women and
> >children. I don't know why he wastes his time on the Jesus bullshit
> >because it's clear he's going to hell when he dies. There's no other
> >fate for people like him.
>
> Ben, what do you do for a living or as a hobby? Are you certain that
> no spin-off effects from anything you've ever done have resulted in
> some person being killed or injured?
>
> Are those who assemble, sell or service automobiles also murderers?
> Automobile accidents do kill people, regularly.
>
> When I was a kid, a neighbor left a gate open and his saddle horse
> wandered out into a nearby road. A fellow driving a convertible came
> along late that night and slammed into the horse, killing the horse
> and the driver. Did this make my neighbor a murderer?
>
> Gordon

Wait, you are wrong here.
Automobiles can kill people, of course by accident and with no
intention.
But a radar is specifically used for guiding the plane which is
designed to drop bombs.
You are twisting the two together.
Your story also is flawed. Your neighbor was negligent that led to
horse and driver got killed. He might not be the direct murderer, but
he was certainly responsible and would have been sued. In some
country, a negligent act can be criminal.
If you don't buy this argument, what about if you are the driver?