🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 4, 11:34 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Aug 3, 4:18 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>
> > rbwinn wrote:
> > > On Aug 3, 8:12 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > >> rbwinn wrote:
> > >>> On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > >>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> > >>>> in alt.atheism:
> > >>>>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > >>>> ...
> > >>>>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection.
> > >>>>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there?
> > >>>>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of the
> > >>>>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions.
> > >>>> No evidence backs up your claim.
> > >>> Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one.
> > >> I have a Bible. There's no evidence in there to back up your claim.
>
> > > John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the
> > > week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for
> > > fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto
> > > them, Peace be unto you.
>
> > > John 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of
> > > coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
> > > 10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now
> > > caught.
> > > 11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great
> > > fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so
> > > many, yet was not the net broken.
> > > 12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the disciples durst
> > > ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord.
> > > 13 Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish
> > > likewise.
>
> > > 14 This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his
> > > disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
>
> > No, that's not evidence. That's a claim.
>
> Well, you have to understand something about rules of evidence.  If
> something exists, it can be entered into evidence.  The Bible
> exists.
> So what is your position, that the Bible does not exist, therefore it
> cannot be entered into evidence?
> This is the same tactic you have used from the beginning concerning
> Hezekiah's tunnel.
> Robert B. Winn

So, Harry Potter book exists.
That means the fiction figure are real and the book is the evidence?
This is the same as your argument above.