🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 3, 5:29�pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:56:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> in alt.atheism:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Aug 3, 8:53?am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 07:52:40 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> >> in alt.atheism:
>
> >> >On Aug 2, 7:26?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >> >> > On Aug 2, 4:20 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >> >> >>> On Aug 2, 9:46 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> >> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >> >> >>>>> On Aug 1, 7:25 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>> On Aug 1, 6:35 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:34:42 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> >> >> >>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 8:48?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> "DanielSan" <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>news:ueOdnfvcNJRl1wzVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@speakeasy.net...
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 6:19?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>news:5b37c66a-589f-4dc3-8ef3-b8ce66e66846@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 10:12?pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 6:14?pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 10:08 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:efa8da13-56b6-4386-bfe5-c571b689a669@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is the same yesterday, today, and forever.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have no evidence at all about God.- Hide quoted text -
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you like me to send you a copy of the Bible?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You could, but it would be much better if you could provide some
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God as well.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve O
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God sent His Only Begotten Son, Steve. ?If that was not enough for
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you, nothing I could do or say is going to convince you of anything.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn- Hide quoted text -
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You idiot.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of American soldiers died for their country and died for you,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not even one of them had been recognized by you to be much better
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> than the stupid Jesus who was a Middle-Eastern person in ancient time?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You must be a real traitor and a mentally impaired shit !- Hide quoted
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> text -
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The person you refer to as the stupid Jesus who was a middle eastern
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> person in ancient time advised soldiers to do no violence to any man.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe fewer American soldiers would have died for their country if
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> they had paid more attention to what Jesus said. ?Anyway, you are
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> starting to sound like a Nazi propagandist about what a traitor is. ?I
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> already did four years in the American military.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ===================================
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you didn't take your supposed jesus' advice.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why was that?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I did take the advice of Jesus. ?I worked on radar instead of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> shooting other people while I was in the military.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> So, you told others where they could kill.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> The admitted liar now admits to hypocrisy as well.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Par for the course for xians.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Radar just shows the positions of airplanes and ships. It does not
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> tell anyone to do anything.
> >> >> >>>>>>>> How disingenuous of you.- Hide quoted text -
> >> >> >>>>>>> As I understand it, you are saying that you think I am a killer
> >> >> >>>>>>> because I fixed radar in the Navy, while you as a harmless civilian
> >> >> >>>>>>> just voted for pro-abortion political candidates, so you are
> >> >> >>>>>>> completely innocent of shedding blood.
> >> >> >>>>>> Sorry, but there's no such thing as a pro-abortion political candidate.
> >> >> >>>>> Well, you vote for the candidates you like, and I will vote for the
> >> >> >>>>> candidates I like.
> >> >> >>>> Sounds good, but what does that have to do with the lack of existence of
> >> >> >>>> "pro-abortion" political candidates?
> >> >> >>> Don't worry about it. There will never be any lack of pro-abortion
> >> >> >>> candidates for you to vote for.
> >> >> >> Can you list these "pro-abortion" candidates for me? I can't find any.
>
> >> >> >> Please cite quotes from these candidates that made you think they're
> >> >> >> "pro-abortion".
>
> >> >> > Immoral people are going to want the option of abortion. ?
>
> >> >> Which is in total contradiction of being "pro-abortion".
>
> >> >> > Immoral
> >> >> > people are going to support immoral candidates for office. ?So we have
> >> >> > an immoral government. ?
>
> >> >> Immoral to you, perhaps.
>
> >> >> > The government of the United States is the
> >> >> > people. ?In case you did not notice, the people are immoral. ?So what
> >> >> > are you trying to do, convince me that these immoral people do not
> >> >> > elect pro-abortion candidates to office?
>
> >> >> I am saying that there's no such thing as a "pro-abortion candidate".
>
> >> >> > Most of the people in public office are pro-abortion.
>
> >> >> Um, no. ?No, they're not.
>
> >> >It does not matter what you say or think. ?What matters is what these
> >> >people do in public office. ?They support population control by means
> >> >of abortion, just the same as is done in China.
>
> >> In the United States? Please name anyone who has done that.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >The United States Supreme Court.
>
> In which case? Hint, it is not Roe v. Wade.- Hide quoted text -
>
Roe v. Wade makes it possible for the government and medical science
to kill any unborn child they want to kill.  The fact that they only
kill certain ones now does not mean they will not do what China has
done and start killing unborn children that the parents want to be
born.  Roe v. Wade means that all Americans are just as protected by
the law as unborn children are.
Robert B. Winn