🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:56:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote
in alt.atheism:

>On Aug 3, 8:53?am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 07:52:40 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
>> in alt.atheism:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Aug 2, 7:26?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> >> rbwinn wrote:
>> >> > On Aug 2, 4:20 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> >> >> rbwinn wrote:
>> >> >>> On Aug 2, 9:46 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> >> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
>> >> >>>>> On Aug 1, 7:25 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>> On Aug 1, 6:35 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:34:42 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
>> >> >>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 8:48?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> "DanielSan" <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>news:ueOdnfvcNJRl1wzVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@speakeasy.net...
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 6:19?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>news:5b37c66a-589f-4dc3-8ef3-b8ce66e66846@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 10:12?pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 6:14?pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 10:08 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:efa8da13-56b6-4386-bfe5-c571b689a669@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is the same yesterday, today, and forever.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have no evidence at all about God.- Hide quoted text -
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you like me to send you a copy of the Bible?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You could, but it would be much better if you could provide some
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence of
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God as well.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve O
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God sent His Only Begotten Son, Steve. ?If that was not enough for
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you, nothing I could do or say is going to convince you of anything.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn- Hide quoted text -
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You idiot.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of American soldiers died for their country and died for you,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not even one of them had been recognized by you to be much better
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> than the stupid Jesus who was a Middle-Eastern person in ancient time?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You must be a real traitor and a mentally impaired shit !- Hide quoted
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> text -
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The person you refer to as the stupid Jesus who was a middle eastern
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> person in ancient time advised soldiers to do no violence to any man.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe fewer American soldiers would have died for their country if
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> they had paid more attention to what Jesus said. ?Anyway, you are
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> starting to sound like a Nazi propagandist about what a traitor is. ?I
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> already did four years in the American military.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ===================================
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you didn't take your supposed jesus' advice.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why was that?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I did take the advice of Jesus. ?I worked on radar instead of
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> shooting other people while I was in the military.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> So, you told others where they could kill.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> The admitted liar now admits to hypocrisy as well.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Par for the course for xians.
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Radar just shows the positions of airplanes and ships. It does not
>> >> >>>>>>>>> tell anyone to do anything.
>> >> >>>>>>>> How disingenuous of you.- Hide quoted text -
>> >> >>>>>>> As I understand it, you are saying that you think I am a killer
>> >> >>>>>>> because I fixed radar in the Navy, while you as a harmless civilian
>> >> >>>>>>> just voted for pro-abortion political candidates, so you are
>> >> >>>>>>> completely innocent of shedding blood.
>> >> >>>>>> Sorry, but there's no such thing as a pro-abortion political candidate.
>> >> >>>>> Well, you vote for the candidates you like, and I will vote for the
>> >> >>>>> candidates I like.
>> >> >>>> Sounds good, but what does that have to do with the lack of existence of
>> >> >>>> "pro-abortion" political candidates?
>> >> >>> Don't worry about it. There will never be any lack of pro-abortion
>> >> >>> candidates for you to vote for.
>> >> >> Can you list these "pro-abortion" candidates for me? I can't find any.
>>
>> >> >> Please cite quotes from these candidates that made you think they're
>> >> >> "pro-abortion".
>>
>> >> > Immoral people are going to want the option of abortion. ?
>>
>> >> Which is in total contradiction of being "pro-abortion".
>>
>> >> > Immoral
>> >> > people are going to support immoral candidates for office. ?So we have
>> >> > an immoral government. ?
>>
>> >> Immoral to you, perhaps.
>>
>> >> > The government of the United States is the
>> >> > people. ?In case you did not notice, the people are immoral. ?So what
>> >> > are you trying to do, convince me that these immoral people do not
>> >> > elect pro-abortion candidates to office?
>>
>> >> I am saying that there's no such thing as a "pro-abortion candidate".
>>
>> >> > Most of the people in public office are pro-abortion.
>>
>> >> Um, no. ?No, they're not.
>>
>> >It does not matter what you say or think. ?What matters is what these
>> >people do in public office. ?They support population control by means
>> >of abortion, just the same as is done in China.
>>
>> In the United States? Please name anyone who has done that.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>The United States Supreme Court.

In which case? Hint, it is not Roe v. Wade.