🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Aug 3, 4:25�pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>>> On Aug 3, 8:21 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 3, 4:29 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>> On Aug 2, 7:16 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Most independent voters do not have the means to meet the requirements
>>>>>>>>>>> for ballot access that party politicians have imposed.
>>>>>>>>>> Most PEOPLE do not have the means to meet the requirements for ballot
>>>>>>>>>> access that the party politicians have imposed.
>>>>>>>>> Well, I am sure that you Europeans are very impressed by that, but we
>>>>>>>>> Americans would like to have our own system of elections in effect.
>>>>>>>>> Democrats and Republicans see the voters as their personal property
>>>>>>>>> the same way Nazi party members saw the people of Germany as their
>>>>>>>>> personal property before World War II.
>>>>>>>> I notice you TOTALLY ignored the demolition of your claim.
>>>>>>> Well, you Party members do not like to be ignored, I know that much.
>>>>>>> Sorry, but I registered as an independent voter the first time i
>>>>>>> voted.
>>>>>> So did I. And your claim that Independent voters cannot run for office
>>>>>> was demolished.
>>>>> Independent voters cannot run for public office.
>>>> Then how did Bernie Sanders get into office?
>>>>> You said it
>>>>> yourself.
>>>> Where?
>>>>> As recent as the 1970's there were states where an
>>>>> independent voter could run for President of the United States with 24
>>>>> nomination petition signatures. That is no longer true. Party
>>>>> politicians have passed laws in almost all states since that time
>>>>> putting candidacy for office out of the reach of independent voters.
>>>>> Unless a person running for office has a party faction behind him, he
>>>>> cannot meet the requirements to get on the ballot. Party politicians
>>>>> make certain that a person running for office has to solicit money and
>>>>> organize faction, making all candidates automatically part of the
>>>>> corruption of party politics. Until recently in American government
>>>>> this was not true. When the government first started, elections were
>>>>> conducted to include ordinary citizens.
>>>> Then why can I find evidence of Independents running for office
>>>> throughout our nation's history...up to this election?
>>> Up until this election independent voters were allowed and able to
>>> register as candidates in the United States, although since 1800, the
>>> party controlled news media has never publicized anything except party
>>> candidates.
>>> Now in this election, Green Party candidate Ralph Nader is running as
>>> an independent candidate. �However, Mr. Nader is not an independent
>>> voter. �You would also discover that almost all independent candidates
>>> in the United States have not been independent voters.
>> How do you define "independent voters"?
>>
>> --
> An independent voter is a voter who is not registered as a member of a
> political party.   Originally all voters in the United States were
> independent voters.

How about a voter who is registered as an Independent?

-- 
****************************************************
*          DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226          *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* Can God create a Thai dish so spicy that even He *
* can't eat it?                                    *
****************************************************