🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 20:50:38 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote
in alt.atheism:

>On Aug 3, 4:29?pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
>> in alt.atheism:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Aug 3, 8:12?am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> >> rbwinn wrote:
>> >> > On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> >> >> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
>> >> >> in alt.atheism:
>>
>> >> >>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> >> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
>> >> >> ...
>>
>> >> >>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection.
>> >> >>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there?
>> >> >>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of the
>> >> >>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions.
>> >> >> No evidence backs up your claim.
>>
>> >> > Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one.
>>
>> >> I have a Bible. ?There's no evidence in there to back up your claim.
>>
>> >John 20:19 ?Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the
>> >week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for
>> >fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto
>> >them, Peace be unto you.
>>
>> >John 21:9 ?As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of
>> >coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
>> >10 ? Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now
>> >caught.
>> >11 ? Simon Peter ?went up, and drew the net to land full of great
>> >fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: ?and for all there were so
>> >many, yet was not the net broken.
>> >12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the disciples durst
>> >ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord.
>> >13 ?Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish
>> >likewise.
>>
>> >14 ?This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his
>> >disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
>>
>> The Bible still is not evidence. I asked for evidence.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>
>The Bible is accepted as evidence in court.  So why don't you accept
>it as evidence?

The Bible is not accepted as evidence in court except to the extent of
identifying what the words in it might be if there were a controversy.
It is never allowed for history or science.