🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Aug 3, 8:21�am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>>> On Aug 3, 4:29 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 2, 7:16 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Most independent voters do not have the means to meet the requirements
>>>>>>>>> for ballot access that party politicians have imposed.
>>>>>>>> Most PEOPLE do not have the means to meet the requirements for ballot
>>>>>>>> access that the party politicians have imposed.
>>>>>>> Well, I am sure that you Europeans are very impressed by that, but we
>>>>>>> Americans would like to have our own system of elections in effect.
>>>>>>> Democrats and Republicans see the voters as their personal property
>>>>>>> the same way Nazi party members saw the people of Germany as their
>>>>>>> personal property before World War II.
>>>>>> I notice you TOTALLY ignored the demolition of your claim.
>>>>> Well, you Party members do not like to be ignored, I know that much.
>>>>> Sorry, but I registered as an independent voter the first time i
>>>>> voted.
>>>> So did I. And your claim that Independent voters cannot run for office
>>>> was demolished.
>>> Independent voters cannot run for public office. �
>> Then how did Bernie Sanders get into office?
>>
>>> You said it
>>> yourself. �
>> Where?
>>
>>> As recent as the 1970's there were states where an
>>> independent voter could run for President of the United States with 24
>>> nomination petition signatures. �That is no longer true. �Party
>>> politicians have passed laws in almost all states since that time
>>> putting candidacy for office out of the reach of independent voters.
>>> Unless a person running for office has a party faction behind him, he
>>> cannot meet the requirements to get on the ballot. �Party politicians
>>> make certain that a person running for office has to solicit money and
>>> organize faction, making all candidates automatically part of the
>>> corruption of party politics. �Until recently in American government
>>> this was not true. �When the government first started, elections were
>>> conducted to include ordinary citizens.
>> Then why can I find evidence of Independents running for office
>> throughout our nation's history...up to this election?
>>
> Up until this election independent voters were allowed and able to
> register as candidates in the United States, although since 1800, the
> party controlled news media has never publicized anything except party
> candidates.
> Now in this election, Green Party candidate Ralph Nader is running as
> an independent candidate.  However, Mr. Nader is not an independent
> voter.  You would also discover that almost all independent candidates
> in the United States have not been independent voters.

How do you define "independent voters"?

-- 
****************************************************
*          DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226          *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* Can God create a Thai dish so spicy that even He *
* can't eat it?                                    *
****************************************************