🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 2, 4:22 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Aug 2, 9:51 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Aug 1, 7:33 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 1, 6:48 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:48:10 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> >>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>>>> On Jul 31, 9:07?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>news:6feg2oFb88s6U1@mid.individual.net...
> >>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>news:03071fc3-e432-49b6-a4a5-c22bd4a879ab@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 9:45?pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
> >>>>>>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 10:47 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 1:19 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 12:11 am, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 9:59 am, "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:85ce5d7c-67c2-4090-8fd1-14d9b48f203d@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are only two commandments in the Law of Christ:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Love the Lord thy God, Love thy neighbor as thyself.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ========
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, but I draw the line at giving my neighbour hand jobs.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (as he will no doubt be relieved to hear).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone who engages in homosexuality does not love the other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since he is contributing to that person's damnation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up this silly claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you take it up with Einstein when he returns, that idea
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing to do with me.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would Einstein be interested in homosexuality?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would Jesus?- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>> All homosexuals will be judged by Jesus, the same as with sinners of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> any kind.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>>>>>>>>> Why don't we just wait for him before judging them then?
> >>>>>>>>>>> I happen to think that if anyone needs judging it is the liars and
> >>>>>>>>>>> hypocrites. ?But you don't see me campaigning to remove their human
> >>>>>>>>>>> rights.
> >>>>>>>>>> Well, yes, I do. ? Like other atheists you campaign for abortion,
> >>>>>>>>>> which removes the right to live of the people who are killed.
> >>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>>>>>>> Stop being such an idiot.
> >>>>>>>>> Why do you equate atheism with pro-abortionism?
> >>>>>>>>> They are not the same thing.
> >>>>>>>>> You have already been corrected in your mistaken belief that all atheists
> >>>>>>>>> are pro-abortion, so why do you insist on lying?
> >>>>>>>> We may be (and I am) pro-choice, but none, AFAIK, are pro-abortion.
> >>>>>>> Pro-choice today is used interchangably with pro-abortion.
> >>>>>> Only by liars, particularly the liars who call themselves pro-life, but
> >>>>>> prove by their politics that they love killing people.
> >>>>>>> You are
> >>>>>>> not pro-choice because you are opposed to the choices that would be
> >>>>>>> made by any children killed by abortion.
> >>>>>> Children are not killed by abortion.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>> Well, here we are at another word besides gay that atheists are trying
> >>>>> to change the meaning of. Fortunately for Christian people, we have
> >>>>> the Bible.
> >>>>> Luke 2:4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of
> >>>>> Nazareth, into Judea, unto the city of David, which is called
> >>>>> Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)
> >>>>> 5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.
> >>>>> So do you really think you are going to be able to change the meaning?
> >>>> Yes. We're not going to allow you to change the meaning of the word
> >>>> "child" to mean anything from fertilization on.
> >>> Well, take a good look at verse five. That was not written by me. It
> >>> was written by a physician .
> >> Verse 5....in which translation?
>
> >> Hint: Luke was not written in English.
>
> > It means the same in Greek as it does in English.
>
> Yes.  It doesn't say anything about "child".  It says "εγκυω (egkuos)".
>   Egkuos means pregnant.
>
So you are saying that Luke as a physician was so ignorant that he
could not tell that a pregnant woman was with child?
Robert B. Winn