🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Aug 2, 4:22 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>>> On Aug 2, 9:51 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 1, 7:33 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 6:48 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:48:10 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 9:07?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:6feg2oFb88s6U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:03071fc3-e432-49b6-a4a5-c22bd4a879ab@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 9:45?pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 10:47 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 1:19 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 12:11 am, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 9:59 am, "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:85ce5d7c-67c2-4090-8fd1-14d9b48f203d@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are only two commandments in the Law of Christ:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Love the Lord thy God, Love thy neighbor as thyself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ========
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, but I draw the line at giving my neighbour hand jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (as he will no doubt be relieved to hear).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone who engages in homosexuality does not love the other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since he is contributing to that person's damnation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up this silly claim.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you take it up with Einstein when he returns, that idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing to do with me.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would Einstein be interested in homosexuality?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would Jesus?- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All homosexuals will be judged by Jesus, the same as with sinners of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any kind.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't we just wait for him before judging them then?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I happen to think that if anyone needs judging it is the liars and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrites. ?But you don't see me campaigning to remove their human
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yes, I do. ? Like other atheists you campaign for abortion,
>>>>>>>>>>>> which removes the right to live of the people who are killed.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>> Stop being such an idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you equate atheism with pro-abortionism?
>>>>>>>>>>> They are not the same thing.
>>>>>>>>>>> You have already been corrected in your mistaken belief that all atheists
>>>>>>>>>>> are pro-abortion, so why do you insist on lying?
>>>>>>>>>> We may be (and I am) pro-choice, but none, AFAIK, are pro-abortion.
>>>>>>>>> Pro-choice today is used interchangably with pro-abortion.
>>>>>>>> Only by liars, particularly the liars who call themselves pro-life, but
>>>>>>>> prove by their politics that they love killing people.
>>>>>>>>> You are
>>>>>>>>> not pro-choice because you are opposed to the choices that would be
>>>>>>>>> made by any children killed by abortion.
>>>>>>>> Children are not killed by abortion.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>> Well, here we are at another word besides gay that atheists are trying
>>>>>>> to change the meaning of. Fortunately for Christian people, we have
>>>>>>> the Bible.
>>>>>>> Luke 2:4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of
>>>>>>> Nazareth, into Judea, unto the city of David, which is called
>>>>>>> Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)
>>>>>>> 5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.
>>>>>>> So do you really think you are going to be able to change the meaning?
>>>>>> Yes. We're not going to allow you to change the meaning of the word
>>>>>> "child" to mean anything from fertilization on.
>>>>> Well, take a good look at verse five. That was not written by me. It
>>>>> was written by a physician .
>>>> Verse 5....in which translation?
>>>> Hint: Luke was not written in English.
>>> It means the same in Greek as it does in English.
>> Yes.  It doesn't say anything about "child".  It says "����� (egkuos)".
>>   Egkuos means pregnant.
>>
> So you are saying that Luke as a physician was so ignorant that he
> could not tell that a pregnant woman was with child?

Luke didn't write the Gospel of Luke, numbnuts.

Secondly, "with child" is not a medical term.  It is a colloquialism. 
Are you seriously suggesting that, since some people call being pregnant 
being "with child", that that means that there is a child in the womb?

I was at the store today and I heard a wife call her husband a "honey 
bunny".  Does that mean that husband is lapine in nature and is covered 
in the thick processed pollen of flowers?


-- 
****************************************************
*          DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226          *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* Can God create a Thai dish so spicy that even He *
* can't eat it?                                    *
****************************************************