Article View: sci.physics
Article #1185Re: Electrical Conductivity an Intensive Variable?
From: Leigh Palmer
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 17:11
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 17:11
21 lines
1235 bytes
1235 bytes
In article <92104.123138CCB104@psuvm.psu.edu> CCB104@psuvm.psu.edu asks: >Is electrical conductivity considered to be an intensive variable? Please >explain briefly why or why not if you decide to say yes or no! Thanks! >Carey I will assume this question was asked in the context of classical thermodynamics. In such a context "intensive" quantities pertain to the substance, but not to the extent, or size, of the system. Electrical conductivity is certainly in that category *classically*, but in reality conductivity is dependent upon nonlocal influences, and for systems with sufficiently small dimensions electrical conduc- tivity could certainly fail to satisfy the condition that it does not depend upon the size of the system. This in no way relegates conductivity to the "extensive" category in such cases. Leigh Palmer
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr14.171137.10230@sfu.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!newsserver.sfu.ca!newsReferences:
<92104.123138CCB104@psuvm.psu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!newsserver.sfu.ca!news From: palmer@sfu.ca (Leigh Palmer) Subject: Re: Electrical Conductivity an Intensive Variable? Message-ID: <1992Apr14.171137.10230@sfu.ca> Sender: news@sfu.ca Organization: Simon Fraser University References: <92104.123138CCB104@psuvm.psu.edu> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 17:11:37 GMT Lines: 21