Article View: sci.physics
Article #1192Re: An easy problem in general relativity
From: Mcinnes B T (Dr)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 06:01
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 06:01
10 lines
996 bytes
996 bytes
JB: As you say, cosmic censorship is a "touchy-feely" kind of thing. And that is what I had in mind when I said that there is nowadays even less reason to believe in it. As for llamas etc coming out of naked singularities: how exactly does one prove this? But anyway, I agree that strange things are likely in the vicinity of a naked singularity. But so what? What do you have against llamas? Finally: what makes you say that quantum gravity is likely to do away with the singularities? Do people have specific reasons for thinking so,other than "quantum good, singularity bad"?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug12.060105.10373@nuscc.nus.sg>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!nuscc!matmcinnReferences:
<1992Aug11.163152.27549@galois.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!nuscc!matmcinn From: matmcinn@nuscc.nus.sg (Mcinnes B T (Dr)) Subject: Re: An easy problem in general relativity Message-ID: <1992Aug12.060105.10373@nuscc.nus.sg> Organization: National University of Singapore References: <1992Aug11.163152.27549@galois.mit.edu> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 06:01:05 GMT Lines: 10