🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 21, 7:15�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
<alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> On Jul 21, 5:48 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 20, 7:28 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>
> > <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > On Jul 21, 12:22 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 20, 2:16 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>
> > > > <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > > > On Jul 19, 3:21 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 18, 5:32 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > rbwinn wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Jul 17, 6:47 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > > >>> George W. Bush is completely irrelevant, as the next President of the
> > > > > > > >>> United States will be. All major decisions are made by the atheistic
> > > > > > > >>> Supreme Court, which at the present time holds the position of
> > > > > > > >>> Judicial dictatorship in the United States.
> > > > > > > >> Religious affiliations of Supreme Court Justices:
> > > > > > > >> Roberts: Roman Catholic
> > > > > > > >> Stevens: Protestant
> > > > > > > >> Scalia: Roman Catholic
> > > > > > > >> Kennedy: Roman Catholic
> > > > > > > >> Souter: Episcopalian
> > > > > > > >> Thomas: Roman Catholic
> > > > > > > >> Breyer: Jewish
> > > > > > > >> Alito: Roman Catholic
> > > > > > > >> Ginsburg: Jewish
>
> > > > > > > >> The Supreme Court follows the Constitution of the United States of
> > > > > > > >> America, the federal law of the land.
>
> > > > > > > >> What were you saying again?
>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > During my lifetime the Supreme Court has not made even one decision
> > > > > > > > that did not promote atheism. It does not matter if they all claim to
> > > > > > > > be religious. Actions speak louder than words.
>
> > > > > > > Perhaps you can name me one decision that "promoted atheism".
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > Roe v. Wade
>
> > > > > > Robert B. Winn
>
> > > > > Roe v Wade was a decision made on the grounds of violation of
> > > > > privacy. Not a theological argument anywhere.
> > > > > Any more?
>
> > > > > Al- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > Roe v. Wade was made on the grounds of atheism.
> > > > Robert B. Winn
>
> > > You might want to review some court transcripts of the case. �It was
> > > based on a privacy issue. �Saying otherwise doesn't make it any less
> > > true.
>
> > > Al- Hide quoted text -
>
> > It had nothing to do with privacy. �The purpose was to impose European
> > legal interpretation on the United States.
> > Robert B. Winn
>
> Go read something not written by your church will you?
> And your legal system is based on the English system, which borrows
> heavily from other systems. �Get over it.
>
> Al- Hide quoted text -
>
Actually our legal system is based on the Constitution of the United
States, much to the surprise of atheists.
Robert B. Winn