Article View: sci.physics
Article #12069Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:15
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:15
80 lines
5008 bytes
5008 bytes
On Jul 21, 5:48 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > On Jul 20, 7:28 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > On Jul 21, 12:22 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 20, 2:16�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > > > <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > > On Jul 19, 3:21 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 18, 5:32 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote: > > > > > > > rbwinn wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 17, 6:47 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > > > >>> George W. Bush is completely irrelevant, as the next President of the > > > > > > >>> United States will be. �All major decisions are made by the atheistic > > > > > > >>> Supreme Court, which at the present time holds the position of > > > > > > >>> Judicial dictatorship in the United States. > > > > > > >> Religious affiliations of Supreme Court Justices: > > > > > > >> Roberts: Roman Catholic > > > > > > >> Stevens: Protestant > > > > > > >> Scalia: Roman Catholic > > > > > > >> Kennedy: Roman Catholic > > > > > > >> Souter: Episcopalian > > > > > > >> Thomas: Roman Catholic > > > > > > >> Breyer: Jewish > > > > > > >> Alito: Roman Catholic > > > > > > >> Ginsburg: Jewish > > > > > > > >> The Supreme Court follows the Constitution of the United States of > > > > > > >> America, the federal law of the land. > > > > > > > >> What were you saying again? > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > During my lifetime the Supreme Court has not made even one decision > > > > > > > that did not promote atheism. �It does not matter if they all claim to > > > > > > > be religious. �Actions speak louder than words. > > > > > > > Perhaps you can name me one decision that "promoted atheism". > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Roe v. Wade > > > > > > Robert B. Winn > > > > > Roe v Wade was a decision made on the grounds of violation of > > > > privacy. �Not a theological argument anywhere. > > > > Any more? > > > > > Al- Hide quoted text - > > > > Roe v. Wade was made on the grounds of atheism. > > > Robert B. Winn > > > You might want to review some court transcripts of the case. It was > > based on a privacy issue. Saying otherwise doesn't make it any less > > true. > > > Al- Hide quoted text - > > It had nothing to do with privacy. The purpose was to impose European > legal interpretation on the United States. > Robert B. Winn Go read something not written by your church will you? And your legal system is based on the English system, which borrows heavily from other systems. Get over it. Al
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bae2f583-28f3-46b5-b932-2acf1489ce5a@p25g2000pri.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!p25g2000pri.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<sba274h0m6sfce2dq2q7nqsrh2lca5pnva@4ax.com> <ccb99694-055d-4154-893a-872085daf30d@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <BcudnaoqD5RkteLVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com> <476cc203-1500-4d0f-b16f-daa4210ab9d7@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <vIudnZtb_aaLo-LVnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@speakeasy.net> <e3bdfbcd-c945-4830-a135-a050a475802c@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <7uKdndfnpO2Ba-LVnZ2dnUVZ_hzinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <e9a3738e-876d-42b7-aeb5-d4c6cf0a22ee@q28g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <c_CdnfIZCtD0EB3VnZ2dnUVZ_uLinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <9445436b-52c9-44e7-8b37-1a8008c43c98@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <b141bbb4-382f-4e64-920e-93443cf9fce2@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <7dcaead7-7298-40bc-a84d-3ea6119576cc@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <0122ea37-770e-4052-aad5-f2de3556e795@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <b439f0e2-eeaa-41de-b6fa-3db312c88ace@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,dac8026861d35fee X-Google-Thread: f442a,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid102f53,gidf442a,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!p25g2000pri.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" <alwhipp@optusnet.com.au> Newsgroups: sci.physics,cam.misc,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism Subject: Re: Does God need to prove He exists? Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 80 Message-ID: <bae2f583-28f3-46b5-b932-2acf1489ce5a@p25g2000pri.googlegroups.com> References: <sba274h0m6sfce2dq2q7nqsrh2lca5pnva@4ax.com> <ccb99694-055d-4154-893a-872085daf30d@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <BcudnaoqD5RkteLVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com> <476cc203-1500-4d0f-b16f-daa4210ab9d7@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <vIudnZtb_aaLo-LVnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@speakeasy.net> <e3bdfbcd-c945-4830-a135-a050a475802c@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <7uKdndfnpO2Ba-LVnZ2dnUVZ_hzinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <e9a3738e-876d-42b7-aeb5-d4c6cf0a22ee@q28g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <c_CdnfIZCtD0EB3VnZ2dnUVZ_uLinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <9445436b-52c9-44e7-8b37-1a8008c43c98@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <b141bbb4-382f-4e64-920e-93443cf9fce2@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <7dcaead7-7298-40bc-a84d-3ea6119576cc@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <0122ea37-770e-4052-aad5-f2de3556e795@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <b439f0e2-eeaa-41de-b6fa-3db312c88ace@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.9.185.217 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1216692945 30360 127.0.0.1 (22 Jul 2008 02:15:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p25g2000pri.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.9.185.217; posting-account=oq_tpwoAAABC0qABVCSraLayCjGQBILm User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 Firefox/2.0.0.16,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 citcwpi1.pclan.citec.com.au:3128 (IronPort-WSA/5.5.2-030)