🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 19, 3:40 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Jul 18, 5:49 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > rbwinn wrote:
> > > On Jul 17, 8:00 pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> On Jul 17, 11:30 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> On Jul 16, 1:38�pm, Stan-O <bndsna...@aol.com> wrote:
> > >>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:42:35 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Well, the construction of Hezekiah's tunnel was very remarkable. �But
> > >>>>>>> atheists do not like seeing remards about it. �Why is that?
> > >>>>>> I have nothing against the tunnel. No, what I dislike is your butchery
> > >>>>>> of logic.- Hide quoted text -
> > >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> > >>>>> Well, choose for yourself what you like or dislike. �It means nothing
> > >>>>> to me. �If you or any other atheist decides to discuss the tunnel,
> > >>>>> come back and do it some time without trying to change the subject to
> > >>>>> Harry Potter.
> > >>>> Making a comparison between two pieces of literature is hardly
> > >>>> changing the subject.
> > >>> So you think the Bible is like a Harry Potter book.  What is the point
> > >>> of discussing it further with you then?
> > >>> Robert B. Winn
> > >> The Harry Potter book is another bible story book...and you fail to
> > >> recognize this fact simply because of your mental problem.
> > >> Now, I have pointed this out and you should be clear about it.
>
> > >> I have actually thought that you should check out this fact with your
> > >> doctor, but since you distrust those psychiatrist, may be you should
> > >> then seek second opinion from scientist/atheists. However, since your
> > >> brain frequency is not in line with scientist/atheists, may be the
> > >> final choice would be the theist.
> > >> One advise, if one theist were to play a trick on you by confirming
> > >> Harry Potter the same as Bible, your state of mind may get such a
> > >> shock that the hospital would have to lock you up forever.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > > I think that what you just wrote will one day be canonized as
> > > atheistic scripture.
>
> > There's no such thing as "atheistic scripture".
>
> > --
> > ******************************************************
> > *          DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226            *
> > *--------------------------------------------------
>
> So what about the writings of Albert Einstein?  Don't you consider
> them to be scripture?
> Robert B. Winn

No.  Those "writings" are science.  Not atheism.
And scientists will throw them out with glee when someone manages to
prove they have something more accurate.  But you and all the rest of
the crackpots haven't managed that yet.

Al