🚀 go-pugleaf

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message 
news:b0bbcc95-b126-4b2a-a192-2e97bf64ccd7@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 18, 6:21 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Jul 18, 12:20 am, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Jul 17, 12:59 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 16, 1:38?pm, Stan-O <bndsna...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:42:35 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Well, the construction of Hezekiah's tunnel was very remarkable. 
> >>>>>>>>> ?But
> >>>>>>>>> atheists do not like seeing remards about it. ?Why is that?
> >>>>>>>> I have nothing against the tunnel. No, what I dislike is your 
> >>>>>>>> butchery
> >>>>>>>> of logic.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>> Well, choose for yourself what you like or dislike. ?It means 
> >>>>>>> nothing
> >>>>>>> to me. ?If you or any other atheist decides to discuss the tunnel,
> >>>>>>> come back and do it some time without trying to change the subject 
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> Harry Potter.
> >>>>>> Making a comparison between two pieces of literature is hardly
> >>>>>> changing the subject.
> >>>>> So you think the Bible is like a Harry Potter book. What is the 
> >>>>> point
> >>>>> of discussing it further with you then?
> >>>> Can you not defend your beliefs? If the Bible is anything like you 
> >>>> say
> >>>> it is, there shouldn't be so much far removed from reality in there.
> >>>> Flying broomsticks are more believable than a global flood.- Hide 
> >>>> quoted text -
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>> Well, I am sure that flying broomsticks are believable to atheists,
> >>> but that is irrelevant. The subject was the Bible, not sorcery or
> >>> flying broomsticks. Atheists always want to change the subject to
> >>> Harry Potter in any discussion.
> >> It seems about as plausible. Now, about that flood?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > Well, flooding does seem possible. Ask some of the people in Cedar
> > Rapids if they believe floods are possible.
>
> No, BT wasn't talking about floods, he was talking about "that flood".
> You know, the global one.
>
> --
> ******************************************************
> * DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *

I was not there.  You might want to talk to Noah after the
resurrection.
=======================================
I was not there.  You might want to talk to Harry Potter.