🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2:40 am, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> On Jul 17, 10:23 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 16, 7:43 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>>> On Jul 17, 5:36 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 15, 11:16 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 11:50 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 10:51 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 7:13 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>>>>>>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 10:39 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 3:26 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 11:59 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 12:01�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Linda Fox" <linda...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8vih74pvkgdkcmula0art55aogmd3pvne1@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:20:29 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A two year old is learning to lie or tell the truth. �If a two year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old sees its parents lie all the time, then the two year old is going
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do the same thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ho-kayyyy - tell us please, because we'd love to know, how a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two-year-old can tell its parents are lying when it does not know the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truth itself. Unless it's by watching the nose grow longer and longer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Linda ff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This man obviously has no children.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has absolutely no idea what a two year old can or can't do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look, Bobby, he's two.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has no fucking clue what an atheist or a theist is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He's under my feet right now, pushing toy cars around the floor and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shouting, "Beep Beep"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't even know what a lie is, so how can you expect him to recognize
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve O
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He does not even care.  All he is doing is what he sees you doing.  If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he finds lying to be more effective in getting what he wants, he is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well lets hope he nenver gets involved in religion then, so he wont need to.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How are you going to shield him from the Lorentz equations?  If he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes to school there are books everywhere explaining the miracle of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> length contraction.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What miracle?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If he is smart enough, he wont need to have it explained, he will work
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it out for himself: if he isn't smart enough, he will simply ignore it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as irrelevant to his life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What he will never get, is someone telling him its the Truth, and if he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't believe it, he will go to hell for eternity.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Scientists say that the Lorentz equations show that an object in
>>>>>>>>>>>> motion contracts in length relative to a frame of reference at rest
>>>>>>>>>>>> until at the speed of light, the object has a length of zero.  So you
>>>>>>>>>>>> are bringing up your son in a religion called atheism that has one
>>>>>>>>>>>> miracle.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Whether it is many miracles or only one, a miracle is a miracle.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>> What makes you think Lorentz equations are part of atheism?
>>>>>>>>>>> Is it the same delusion that has you repeatedly posting garbage into
>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism?
>>>>>>>>>> Most scientists of today are atheists.  I was discussing the Lorentz
>>>>>>>>>> equations with scientists in sci.physics.relativity when you atheists
>>>>>>>>>> butted into the conversation in that newsgroup.
>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>> Most scientists today are atheists, yes.  But it's like saying most
>>>>>>>>> people with blonde hair have blue eyes.  The two things aren't
>>>>>>>>> actually related.
>>>>>>>>> And you keep lying about how you started this.  One fruitcake who
>>>>>>>>> claims to be both a scientist and a christian (but bizarely doesn't
>>>>>>>>> understand rainbows) cross-posted originally and you waded in with
>>>>>>>>> your lies and confusion into a topic that was already about proving
>>>>>>>>> this god thing.  And proceeded to lie about everyone.
>>>>>>>>> And now you keep using this myth you've invented about atheists
>>>>>>>>> posting into YOUR conversation about physics.
>>>>>>>> I think the two could be related. Not saying they are, I think that it's
>>>>>>>> likely though. Just my opinion.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>> I think they are related also.  Scientists and atheists have a
>>>>>>> religion that believes in one miracle, length contraction.
>>>>>> liar.
>>>>> Well, OK, Natural, show how the length contraction is not a miracle.
>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>> Define "miracle"
>>>> Al- Hide quoted text -
>>> Miracles are manifestations of higher laws.
>>> Robert B. Winn
>> Define "manifestation" and "higher laws".
>>
>> Al- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> 
> Al, why don't you just go to Merriam-Webster online and look them up
> for yourself?  If you do not understand words, just go to a
> dictionary.

Okay, had a look on dictionary.com. So do you think that your religion 
puts you above the law?