Article View: sci.physics
Article #1255Re: terminal particle energy for accelerators
From: Jonathan M. Gilligan
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 02:02
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 02:02
22 lines
1560 bytes
1560 bytes
In article <1992Apr16.155454.1@sscvx1.ssc.gov> draper@sscvx1.ssc.gov writes: >Just to reiterate a point I made earlier, the limitation for an SSC-type >machine is NOT the radiation, but the magnetic field used to constrain the beam >into a circle. The magnetic field required to collapse a 20TeV ring to the size >of a meter radius, whether it's electrons or protons or Buicks (the latter >suffering almost no synchrotron radiation at all), would be 60,000 Tesla! OK, maybe we can't get 20 TeV electrons into a meter even without synchrotron radiation. However, although I'm a lowly atomic physicist everyone I talk to in particle physics would prefer to look for new particles with e+e- colliders, and there the practical limitation _is_ synchrotron radiation. The only reason to use protons, I'm told, is 1) to study proton structure 2) to avoid synchrotron losses By the way, I can make my coffee cup move in a 1-meter circle at millions of TeV with no difficulty (a million TeV = 0.1 Joule) so the only problem with Buicks is making them small enough. ---Jon
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2867@dove.nist.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dove!gilliganReferences:
<1992Apr14.213121.17723@lmpsbbs.mot.com> <70425@ut-emx.uucp> <1992Apr16.155454.1@sscvx1.ssc.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dove!gilligan From: gilligan@bldrdoc.gov (Jonathan M. Gilligan) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: terminal particle energy for accelerators Message-ID: <2867@dove.nist.gov> Date: 17 Apr 92 02:02:32 GMT References: <1992Apr14.213121.17723@lmpsbbs.mot.com> <70425@ut-emx.uucp> <1992Apr16.155454.1@sscvx1.ssc.gov> Sender: news@dove.nist.gov Distribution: world,local Organization: National Institute of Standards and Technology Lines: 24