🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #12560

Re: Does God need to prove He exists?

#12560
From: rbwinn
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:41
60 lines
4579 bytes
On Jul 18, 6:21 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Jul 18, 12:20 am, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Jul 17, 12:59 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 16, 1:38�pm, Stan-O <bndsna...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:42:35 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Well, the construction of Hezekiah's tunnel was very remarkable. �But
> >>>>>>>>> atheists do not like seeing remards about it. �Why is that?
> >>>>>>>> I have nothing against the tunnel. No, what I dislike is your butchery
> >>>>>>>> of logic.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>> Well, choose for yourself what you like or dislike. �It means nothing
> >>>>>>> to me. �If you or any other atheist decides to discuss the tunnel,
> >>>>>>> come back and do it some time without trying to change the subject to
> >>>>>>> Harry Potter.
> >>>>>> Making a comparison between two pieces of literature is hardly
> >>>>>> changing the subject.
> >>>>> So you think the Bible is like a Harry Potter book.  What is the point
> >>>>> of discussing it further with you then?
> >>>> Can you not defend your beliefs? If the Bible is anything like you say
> >>>> it is, there shouldn't be so much far removed from reality in there.
> >>>> Flying broomsticks are more believable than a global flood.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>> Well, I am sure that flying broomsticks are believable to atheists,
> >>> but that is irrelevant.  The subject was the Bible, not sorcery or
> >>> flying broomsticks.  Atheists always want to change the subject to
> >>> Harry Potter in any discussion.
> >> It seems about as plausible. Now, about that flood?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > Well, flooding does seem possible.  Ask some of the people in Cedar
> > Rapids if they believe floods are possible.
>
> No, BT wasn't talking about floods, he was talking about "that flood".
> You know, the global one.
>
> --
> ******************************************************
> *          DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226            *

I was not there.  You might want to talk to Noah after the
resurrection.
Robert B. Winn
Technical Details
Message-ID: <b0bbcc95-b126-4b2a-a192-2e97bf64ccd7@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1215988736.23696.1@proxy02.news.clara.net> <44f19f98-4d96-4419-a87a-d6bdbd73f31b@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <6e28b7F4n1inU1@mid.individual.net> <a3c2b9ae-59ae-4bfd-b7cf-fcda98b26225@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <6e340hF532qsU1@mid.individual.net> <23670b9d-8fb6-411c-82d0-8611a54d3d62@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <487d9c35$1@clear.net.nz> <f1ad5357-cd88-47b3-937f-5d803f69d133@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <2ums74h926jfoevvk6tdfbttnm0ouc2mkb@4ax.com> <28f77886-333d-460c-aeec-16fc6a3e6107@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <487fa48f$1@clear.net.nz> <6ae3a081-7345-4488-8c94-ff899721b2af@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <4880443a@clear.net.nz> <5c6ebd4d-8857-4305-8eab-bee751e8c694@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <Ho2dnfT5D-9RBR3VnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,cam.misc,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <b0bbcc95-b126-4b2a-a192-2e97bf64ccd7@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
References: <1215988736.23696.1@proxy02.news.clara.net> <44f19f98-4d96-4419-a87a-d6bdbd73f31b@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> 
 <6e28b7F4n1inU1@mid.individual.net> <a3c2b9ae-59ae-4bfd-b7cf-fcda98b26225@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
 <6e340hF532qsU1@mid.individual.net> <23670b9d-8fb6-411c-82d0-8611a54d3d62@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <487d9c35$1@clear.net.nz> <f1ad5357-cd88-47b3-937f-5d803f69d133@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
 <2ums74h926jfoevvk6tdfbttnm0ouc2mkb@4ax.com> <28f77886-333d-460c-aeec-16fc6a3e6107@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
 <487fa48f$1@clear.net.nz> <6ae3a081-7345-4488-8c94-ff899721b2af@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <4880443a@clear.net.nz> <5c6ebd4d-8857-4305-8eab-bee751e8c694@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
 <Ho2dnfT5D-9RBR3VnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.117.9
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1216402905 22348 127.0.0.1 (18 Jul 2008 17:41:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:41:45 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.188.117.9; 
 posting-account=i6vpvwoAAABRbNds_JrzhNT-NaeHIrDG
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.1; AOLBuild 
 4334.36; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.1.5 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 
 spider-dtc-tf01.proxy.aol.com[CDBC70A1] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1
 cache-dtc-ae05.proxy.aol.com[CDBC7509] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])