🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 17, 6:49 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Jul 17, 5:45 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Jul 17, 5:27 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 16, 7:39 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
> >>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Jul 17, 5:21 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Jul 15, 7:49 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
> >>>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 12:10 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 15, 1:00 am, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
> >>>>>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Jul 15, 4:03 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 8:43�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
> >>>>>>>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 15, 1:40 am, ben_dolan_...@reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 2:54 pm, ben_dolan_...@reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your analysis, Peter. �I was merely expanding on a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statement from an atheist to show where it was leading: �Atheists do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not believe anything.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's not true, we believe you're a fuckin' moron... We even have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to take that as an article of faith. �The evidence isn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> compelling. �We do have evidence that he's a liar. �So he could be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> acting incredibly stupid, or more likely be stupid, it's impossible to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell. �But the evidence for lies is overwhelming.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, we believe he's as stupid as dog shit. �But we have evidence, and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thus no need of faith, that he's a liar.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I understand your point, but I believe we have overwhelming evidence of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> both. Bobby is a classic newsgroup troll who desparately craves
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> attention. Lying is an excellent way to get attention, although it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> normally means suffering considerable ridicule and insult in the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> process.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But I also believe he's rather unintelligent (as most newsgroup trolls
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tend to be). He has shown a remarkable inability to absorb and integrate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> new information presented to him. There's no indication he reads
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> anything outside of the few newsgroups he spends countless hours posting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in. And he has shown a breathtaking lack of self awareness and maturity,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> whether about his ridiculous physics kookiness or his puerile religious
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. Taken together these point to someone suffering from mental
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> illness combined with a serious cognitive impairment, or as I prefer to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> think of it, he's a fuckin' moron...
> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I'll agree it's a good summary.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Al- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>> Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Al.  You are agreeing with someone who has a weak mind.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>>>>>>>> I agree or disagree with propositions.  Not people.
> >>>>>>>>>> And your statements are wrong.  Profanity can be used by weak minds to
> >>>>>>>>>> attempt to make a strong statement.  Just because someone uses profane
> >>>>>>>>>> language, does not mean they have a "weak mind".  And what do you mean
> >>>>>>>>>> by "weak mind"?
> >>>>>>>>>> Al- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>> A weak mind is one that cannot deal with reality.
> >>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>>>>>> EG: Christians.
> >>>>>>>> Al- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>> Some Christians do use profanity, but the biggest promoters of
> >>>>>>> profanity are atheists.
> >>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>>>> And yet the minds that demonstrably don't deal with reality are
> >>>>>> christians.  Please do keep up.
> >>>>> Atheists are the people who are trying to make the Bible disappear.
> >>>> Yep.  You've just demonstrated that you aren't dealing with reality.
> >>>> Atheists are not trying to make the Bible disappear.
> >>> Well, I think thy are.
> >> Your thoughts have no bearing on reality.
>
> >>>  That is one reason why they are so intrigued
> >>> by Harry Potter books.
> >> Um, no.  You still aren't getting it, are you?  Harry Potter is just a
> >> convenient fiction story that is set on modern day Earth.  We could've
> >> just as easily used ANY OTHER fiction story that is set on modern day Earth.
>
> >> --
> >> ******************************************************
> >> *          DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226            *
>
> > Well, that is not going to happen when Harry Potter books were the
> > books that outsold the Bible for a short time.
>
> Um, no.  That's not the reason.
>
> I could've easily used Fantastic Voyage, which was set in Washington DC.
>   It even mentioned some buildings there.  Therefore, miniaturization is
> real.
>
> Right?
>
Why don't you just take some time and decide for yourself?
Robert B. Winn