🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Jul 17, 1:05 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>>> On Jul 16, 12:02 am, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 15, 12:25 am, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> On Jul 15, 11:17 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 3:36�pm, cjcountess <cjcount...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi this is Conrad
>>>>>>>> To the three that did respond to my post, all I did is put the
>>>>>>>> evidence out there that the structure of the Universe is parallel to
>>>>>>>> and resembles the structure of the mind. I am confident enough to let
>>>>>>>> the evidence speak for itself and don't have to resort to childish
>>>>>>>> insults. Why some want to turn the Google dialogs into the goo goo
>>>>>>>> gaga childish dialogs I don't know but it is probably because of
>>>>>>>> frustration.
>>>>>>>> The evidence speaks for itself and anyone comparing objectively what
>>>>>>>> it says to what you say will see which is more correct.
>>>>>>>> I don't have to argue this point
>>>>>>>> Conrad
>>>>>>> Conrad,
>>>>>>>         Are you any good at math?  I am trying to figure out if the
>>>>>>> Lorentz equations predict a Doppler effect.  The result I keep getting
>>>>>>> is that the frequency and wavelength in the moving frame of reference
>>>>>>> are the same as the frequency and wavelegth in the frame of reference
>>>>>>> at rest.
>>>>>>> The reason I ask is because you said you had frequency figured into
>>>>>>> your equations.
>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>>> No, he has the same level as you...high school standard and never
>>>>>> think straight, have lots of day dreaming, and always wishful
>>>>>> thinking.
>>>>>> But at least i cannot conclude if he is of the same mental problem as
>>>>>> you...- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>> High school graduates are the most open minded people with regard to
>>>>> relativity of time.
>>>> Possibly because they have among the most limited grasps of the subject
>>>> matter.- Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> Well, scientists will promote equations they know cannot be right
>>> because they make a lot of money doing it.  The only thing that would
>>> change the situation would be other scientists with equations that
>>> agree more closely with experiment, which is not likely to happen as
>>> long as the government is appropriating billions of dollars every year
>>> for accellerators, colliders, and other projects relating to the
>>> Lorentz equations.
>> Yeah, a ton of money in scientific enquiry! All the scientists are
>> getting rich off our backs. If you have serious science to do, do it
>> seriously. Publish your results in the primary literature, and await
>> your Nobel prize. If you're a kook, just keep complaining on usenet. :-)- Hide quoted text -
>>
> 
> I am doing it seriously.  What matters are the equations, not the
> money.

Well okay, when you're published, let us know!