🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Jul 16, 7:39 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> On Jul 17, 5:21 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 15, 7:49 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>>> On Jul 16, 12:10 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 15, 1:00 am, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>> On Jul 15, 4:03 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 8:43�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>>>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Jul 15, 1:40 am, ben_dolan_...@reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 2:54 pm, ben_dolan_...@reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your analysis, Peter. �I was merely expanding on a
>>>>>>>>>>>> statement from an atheist to show where it was leading: �Atheists do
>>>>>>>>>>>> not believe anything.
>>>>>>>>>>> That's not true, we believe you're a fuckin' moron... We even have
>>>>>>>>>>> evidence!
>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to take that as an article of faith. �The evidence isn't
>>>>>>>>>> compelling. �We do have evidence that he's a liar. �So he could be
>>>>>>>>>> acting incredibly stupid, or more likely be stupid, it's impossible to
>>>>>>>>>> tell. �But the evidence for lies is overwhelming.
>>>>>>>>>> So, we believe he's as stupid as dog shit. �But we have evidence, and
>>>>>>>>>> thus no need of faith, that he's a liar.
>>>>>>>>> I understand your point, but I believe we have overwhelming evidence of
>>>>>>>>> both. Bobby is a classic newsgroup troll who desparately craves
>>>>>>>>> attention. Lying is an excellent way to get attention, although it
>>>>>>>>> normally means suffering considerable ridicule and insult in the
>>>>>>>>> process.
>>>>>>>>> But I also believe he's rather unintelligent (as most newsgroup trolls
>>>>>>>>> tend to be). He has shown a remarkable inability to absorb and integrate
>>>>>>>>> new information presented to him. There's no indication he reads
>>>>>>>>> anything outside of the few newsgroups he spends countless hours posting
>>>>>>>>> in. And he has shown a breathtaking lack of self awareness and maturity,
>>>>>>>>> whether about his ridiculous physics kookiness or his puerile religious
>>>>>>>>> nonsense. Taken together these point to someone suffering from mental
>>>>>>>>> illness combined with a serious cognitive impairment, or as I prefer to
>>>>>>>>> think of it, he's a fuckin' moron...
>>>>>>>> OK, I'll agree it's a good summary.
>>>>>>>> Al- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>> Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement,
>>>>>>> Al.  You are agreeing with someone who has a weak mind.
>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>>> I agree or disagree with propositions.  Not people.
>>>>>> And your statements are wrong.  Profanity can be used by weak minds to
>>>>>> attempt to make a strong statement.  Just because someone uses profane
>>>>>> language, does not mean they have a "weak mind".  And what do you mean
>>>>>> by "weak mind"?
>>>>>> Al- Hide quoted text -
>>>>> A weak mind is one that cannot deal with reality.
>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>> EG: Christians.
>>>> Al- Hide quoted text -
>>> Some Christians do use profanity, but the biggest promoters of
>>> profanity are atheists.
>>> Robert B. Winn
>> And yet the minds that demonstrably don't deal with reality are
>> christians.  Please do keep up.
>>
> Atheists are the people who are trying to make the Bible disappear.

Cite? Evidence? Or just bigoted belief?