🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Jul 15, 5:24 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>>> On Jul 14, 8:27 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 14, 5:12�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:44f19f98-4d96-4419-a87a-d6bdbd73f31b@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>> Their idea is that if Hezekiah's tunnel exists, then Harry Potter has
>>>>>>>>> to be true because the train station in London is mentioned in Harry
>>>>>>>>> Potter.
>>>>>>>> Exactly. Since we know therefore that harry potter isn't true, the fact
>>>>>>>> of hezekiahs tunnel means the bible is obviously false. Since we have
>>>>>>>> true facts referred to in works of complete fiction.
>>>>>>>> By your reasoning at least.
>>>>>>> Well, you have it exactly as atheists have been telling me it is.
>>>>>>> Don't ask me what it is supposed to mean.
>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>>> Here is an example of rbwinn's logic.
>>>>>> Sheep are mentioned in the bible
>>>>>> Sheep exist today
>>>>>> The bible is accurate and there is a God
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Steve O
>>>>> Well, no, Steve O.  Here is an example.  Atheists were claiming that
>>>>> nothing existed on earth today that could prove anything in the
>>>>> Bible.  So I said, What about Hezekiah's tunnel?  These atheists had
>>>>> never heard of Hezekiah's tunnel.  So after they looked it up, they
>>>>> said, The fact that a tunnel exists no more proves the Bible to be
>>>>> true than Harry Potter leaving from the train station in London to go
>>>>> to wizard's school.
>>>> The original assertion remains in force.  Hezekiah's Tunnel does not
>>>> prove anything.
>>>>>    I really believe that it certainly does prove certain verses in the
>>>>> Old Testament to be true which describe the digging of Hezekiah's
>>>>> tunnel.  Otherwise, atheists need to explain why there is a tunnel
>>>>> exactly where the Bible in three books of the Old Testament says a
>>>>> tunnel was dug as a conduit for water.
>>>> For the same reason that King's Cross Station exists.
>>>> Wow, you REALLY aren't getting the analogy, are you?
>>> There is nothing in the Book of 2 Chronicles about the construction of
>>> King's Cross Station.
>> Wow, you REALLY aren't getting the analogy, are you?
>>
>> --
> Well, if you can provide a description of the construction of Kings
> Cross station from the time it was built, maybe we could compare it to
> the Biblical account of the construction of Hezekiah's tunnel.

Totally irrelevant to the point. Just to remind you: people make stuff 
up about real places then write it down. Like in Harry Potter, like in 
the Bible. Why believe it just because it includes a real place?