🚀 go-pugleaf

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message 
news:3302305a-67d1-4a82-bf2e-0d656d5d9836@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 14, 8:50?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>
> news:848a8d5f-0b44-40d4-8d12-8a293bbbcf19@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 13, 3:44?pm, ben_dolan_...@reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...@swbell.net> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:03:40 -0700, ben_dolan_...@reet.com (Ben Dolan)
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...@swbell.net> wrote:
>
> > > >> I'm not looking for converts. I'm simply posting my insights for 
> > > >> the
> > > >> benefit of those who may be in the decision making process and want
> > > >> information other than that from a closed minded atheist.
>
> > > >Oops, your prejudices are showing...
>
> > > >And why should anyone give credence to your insights over those of us
> > > >"closed minded atheists"? You strike me as nothing but a run of the
> > > >mill
> > > >religionist, complete with the requisite disdain of atheism. Hardly a
> > > >glowing endorsement worthy of respect.
>
> > > Are you suggesting that I should show about the same level of respect
> > > for atheists as you show for Christians?
>
> > Here's the difference, Skippy. I reserve my scorn and mockery for
> > individuals like yourself, in response to specific claims you have made.
> > I don't disparage "closed minded religionists" as a group. That's being
> > prejudiced, which is why I accused you--not all closed minded
> > religionists.
>
> > I also find it interesting when someone accuses atheists of being closed
> > minded, when in my experience (and I'm not a minority in this), atheists
> > generally are more opened minded, more educated, and more rational than
> > religionists.
>
> > > I don't think I could do this without resorting to a lot of profanity
> > > and
> > > obscenity, and I really don't like using this in my
> > > communications...makes
> > > one look inadequate, insecure and unable to express one's self 
> > > fluently.
>
> > There's a difference between fluency and content. While you are fairly
> > fluent, the content of your claims are utterly preposterous.
>
> > And quite frankly, profanity and obscenity (whatever they are) provide a
> > great deal of expressive power when used appropriately. Just listen to
> > any of the late great George Carlin's monologs.
>
> > > I'm not by any means suggesting that anyone give my insights more
> > > credence than those of an atheist. I just want to make my insights
> > > available to those who are still assembling information to help them
> > > make a decision on this. ?
>
> > Well, I have made a decision on this. The insights you offer are
> > nonsensical, puerile, and clearly derived from years of religious
> > indoctrination combined with some sort of bizarre pseudoscientific mumbo
> > jumbo. As I said, hardly a glowing endorsement worthy of any fuckin'
> > respect...- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I don't think Gordon likes being called Skippy.
> ================================
> We should care, why?
> =======================
> Maybe you could use his correct name next time.
> ==========================
> When he shows some respect for us by not posting his stupid delusions to
> a.a. then we may show him some respect in return.
> The same applies to you, Skippy #2.
>
> Smiler,

That seems very petulant of you, Smiler.
===========================
Fair's fair, Skippy #2.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279