🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Jul 14, 11:41 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>>> On Jul 14, 2:51 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 13, 3:42 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 12:17 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 6:33�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:5cb50cba-4ba0-439e-b696-171329756f9a@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 8:32?pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 8:08 pm, Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...@swbell.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 04:54:03 +0100, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:a122c089-a15c-4a1f-9e0c-9f988874845c@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 9, 11:00 am, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 8:24?pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean there isn't any evidence he existed and it upsets you that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atheists notice this fact...- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could care less what atheists do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ===========================
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then WTF do you reply to us?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Smiler,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The godless one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a.a.# 2279
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not speaking for Robert, but my replies aren't to you, or to any
>>>>>>>>>>>> specific atheist. My replies are intended for other readers who
>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't yet passed the point of no return, and might be looking for
>>>>>>>>>>>> insights from a Christian's perspective. ? Gordon
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, you wish to return to the dark age when everything was barbaric.
>>>>>>>>>>> The Christian perspective as as evil as human can imagine....the
>>>>>>>>>>> killing of non-believers, the slavery, the slaughter of Indians in
>>>>>>>>>>> North/South America for their lands, the conquest of Iraq for its
>>>>>>>>>>> oil...
>>>>>>>>>>> Do we need to forward more examples?
>>>>>>>>>>> And what about the sins of greed, murder planted by your god? You
>>>>>>>>>>> can't pick goodies for god and badies ?not from god. I guess you will
>>>>>>>>>>> be just as hypocrite to pick and choose.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>> Well, you are certainly welcome to your own opinion of me.
>>>>>>>>>> ==============================
>>>>>>>>>> The general opinion of you in a.a. is that you're a pig-ignorant, obnoxious,
>>>>>>>>>> rude, cowardly, lying moron without the intelligence (or is it honesty?) to
>>>>>>>>>> understand a simple concept. You have no concept of logic or the real world
>>>>>>>>>> outside your religion.
>>>>>>>>>> Smiler,
>>>>>>>>> It seems strange to me that you would want to talk to someone you
>>>>>>>>> believe is the way you describe me.  What causes you to keep making
>>>>>>>>> these posts?
>>>>>>>> its scientific research. Its not often you get the chance to probe the
>>>>>>>> depths of human delusion, stupidity and cupidity to the extent that you
>>>>>>>> offer.
>>>>>>> I see.  You probably say something similar about looking at
>>>>>>> pornography.
>>>>>> Whilst I admit that talking to you is somewhat akin to conversing with a
>>>>>> paedophile, I personally haven't seen any pornography since I had tea
>>>>>> with a gay christian, whose rent boy pulled it all out from under the
>>>>>> sofa to show us 'what we get up to'..
>>>>>> That was in my time of hanging ou with the London society of the Golden
>>>>>> Dawn. Started by that great ex (plymouth Brethren) christian, Aleister
>>>>>> Crowley.
>>>>>> sadly on all counts it was a waste of time.
>>>>>  Uh huh.  Well, I was not asking for details of your sins.  They do
>>>>> not interest me.
>>>> That's because you are an utterly selfish person.
>>>> If you were not interested in my so called sins, why did you make te
>>>> statement:-
>>>>  >>> I see.  You probably say something similar about looking at
>>>>  >>> pornography.
>>> So are you admitting that you have sins?  This would be a first for an
>>> atheist.  All other atheists tell me that they do not have sins
>>> because whatever they do is not sin.
>> Sin is a religious concept. A-theist. Geddit?
>>
>> I sometime behave immorally, but for me to call that "sin" would be
>> nonsensical, as I don't believe in the gods of the religions that
>> profess the concept.
>>
>> It's not that hard, is it?- Hide quoted text -
> 
> Well, I would suppose that it all depends on what you want after this
> life.  According to Jesus Christ, the requirement for entering heaven
> is repentance from sins.  So most people say, No, I will not give up
> this or that sin.  Well, that means the person will follow that sin
> where it goes.

We're atheists you see, to us your belief in the afterlife is childish 
wishful thinking. Unless you have some reason for us to take it seriously?

Anything other than your failed claims about Hezekiah's Tunnel that is, 
we ain't buying that one!