🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 14, 10:38 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Jul 14, 2:51 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Jul 13, 3:42 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 13, 12:17 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
> >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Jul 12, 6:33�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>news:5cb50cba-4ba0-439e-b696-171329756f9a@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 8:32?pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 8:08 pm, Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...@swbell.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 04:54:03 +0100, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>news:a122c089-a15c-4a1f-9e0c-9f988874845c@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 9, 11:00 am, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 8:24?pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> (snip)
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You mean there isn't any evidence he existed and it upsets you that
> >>>>>>>>>>>> atheists notice this fact...- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>> I could care less what atheists do.
> >>>>>>>>>>> ===========================
> >>>>>>>>>>> Then WTF do you reply to us?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Smiler,
> >>>>>>>>>>> The godless one
> >>>>>>>>>>> a.a.# 2279
> >>>>>>>>>> I'm not speaking for Robert, but my replies aren't to you, or to any
> >>>>>>>>>> specific atheist. My replies are intended for other readers who
> >>>>>>>>>> haven't yet passed the point of no return, and might be looking for
> >>>>>>>>>> insights from a Christian's perspective. ? Gordon
> >>>>>>>>> Yes, you wish to return to the dark age when everything was barbaric.
> >>>>>>>>> The Christian perspective as as evil as human can imagine....the
> >>>>>>>>> killing of non-believers, the slavery, the slaughter of Indians in
> >>>>>>>>> North/South America for their lands, the conquest of Iraq for its
> >>>>>>>>> oil...
> >>>>>>>>> Do we need to forward more examples?
> >>>>>>>>> And what about the sins of greed, murder planted by your god? You
> >>>>>>>>> can't pick goodies for god and badies ?not from god. I guess you will
> >>>>>>>>> be just as hypocrite to pick and choose.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>>> Well, you are certainly welcome to your own opinion of me.
> >>>>>>>> ==============================
> >>>>>>>> The general opinion of you in a.a. is that you're a pig-ignorant, obnoxious,
> >>>>>>>> rude, cowardly, lying moron without the intelligence (or is it honesty?) to
> >>>>>>>> understand a simple concept. You have no concept of logic or the real world
> >>>>>>>> outside your religion.
> >>>>>>>> Smiler,
> >>>>>>> It seems strange to me that you would want to talk to someone you
> >>>>>>> believe is the way you describe me.  What causes you to keep making
> >>>>>>> these posts?
> >>>>>> its scientific research. Its not often you get the chance to probe the
> >>>>>> depths of human delusion, stupidity and cupidity to the extent that you
> >>>>>> offer.
> >>>>> I see.  You probably say something similar about looking at
> >>>>> pornography.
> >>>> Whilst I admit that talking to you is somewhat akin to conversing with a
> >>>> paedophile, I personally haven't seen any pornography since I had tea
> >>>> with a gay christian, whose rent boy pulled it all out from under the
> >>>> sofa to show us 'what we get up to'..
> >>>> That was in my time of hanging ou with the London society of the Golden
> >>>> Dawn. Started by that great ex (plymouth Brethren) christian, Aleister
> >>>> Crowley.
> >>>> sadly on all counts it was a waste of time.
> >>>  Uh huh.  Well, I was not asking for details of your sins.  They do
> >>> not interest me.
> >> That's because you are an utterly selfish person.
>
> >> If you were not interested in my so called sins, why did you make te
> >> statement:-
>
> >>  >>> I see.  You probably say something similar about looking at
> >>  >>> pornography.
>
> No. I am referring to them as 'so called' sins. That is sins as defined
> by YOU.
>
> > So are you admitting that you have sins?  This would be a first for an
> > atheist.  All other atheists tell me that they do not have sins
> > because whatever they do is not sin.
>
> I have what YOU call sins. They aren't, because the concept is
> meaningless. In absolute terms.
>
Right.  Atheist Josef Stalin said the same thing when he killed 12
million people.
Robert B. Winn