🚀 go-pugleaf

On 14 jul, 05:42, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jul 14, 1:12 am, "pba...@worldonline.nl" <pba...@worldonline.nl>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 13 jul, 16:22, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 13, 12:10 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>
> > > > rbwinn wrote:
> > > > > On Jul 12, 7:29�am, Stan-O <bndsna...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > > >> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:21:44 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
>
> > > > >>>>> You atheists seem to have a lot of trouble with the meanings of
> > > > >>>>> words. ?There was another atheist who seemed to believe that adult and
> > > > >>>>> adulterer meant the same thing.
> > > > >>>>> Robert B. Winn
> > > > >>>> ...which is an old joke that you obviously didn't get.
> > > > >>> It is a very foolish mistake. �Although the two words look and sound
> > > > >>> similar, they mean very different things.
> > > > >>> Robert B. Winn
> > > > >> I'd explain the meaning of "a play on words", but it would be like
> > > > >> pouring water on a rock and expecting it to sink in...
>
> > > > > With atheists, it is not a play on words.  They really believe that
> > > > > adulterers are the most mature adults.
>
> > > > Atheists don't believe anything.
>
> > > > More lies from the Prince of Lies.
>
> > > > Its amazing how much ore of an atheist I want to be, listening to you.
>
> > > Well, there you have it.  Atheists don't believe anything, they don't
> > > do anything, and they don't think anything.  It does not sound very
> > > exciting to me, but maybe it does to an atheist.
> > > Robert B. Winn- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> > > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
>
> > Well. Atheist are not lying their butt off like you do.
> > Most of them believe in natural explanations,
> > most of them have a job,
> > and many of them are intelligent enough not to make as silly a claim
> > as to say someone else doesn't think anything.
>
> > Your statement would be truth though if it was made about dead people.
> > But if all dead people are atheists, what would that mean for heaven
> > and hell?
>
> > Think about it!
> > I am sure you have enough brains to understand,
> > I only doubt whether you will use them on this issue or perfer to keep
> > making silly statements
>
> > Peter van Velzen
> > July 2008
> > Amstelveen
> > The Netherlands
>
> That's where you are wrong, Peter.
> You think rbwinn got brain? OK, has a brain but without cells...
> But you do not know he has mental problem, which the scientists have
> not come up with any cure yet?- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -

I always assume that a person with whom I can have some kind of
conversation, is more or less intelligent in the same way I am.

Though rbwinn sometimes posts like a moron, that does not nescesarily
mean he is one. He sort of acknowledged he was actually mocking
atheism, by pursuing the line "an atheist has no believe". And if that
would indeed be true, than logic requires that the atheist does not
think. For what is there to think about unless you believe something?

Anyway I always treat posters as if they can understand what I am
saying,
and I will keep doing do, however hard those posters are trying not
to.

Love,

Peter van Velzen
July 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands

PS In order to make this post I had to believe:

I exist
You exist
rbwinn exists
My computer exists
Google exists
(my provider doesn't provide Newsgroup access)
sci.physics,cam.mist,alt.sci.physics or alt.atheism exists
English exists
The english words mean what I think they mean
Others can understand the English I produce.

Someone who doesn't believe all of this (except maybe for Google and
rbwinn)
cannot sensibly reply to your post.