Article View: sci.physics
Article #1302Re: The It from Bit: Quantum Logic and Information Theory
From: Andrew Mullhaupt
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 02:31
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 02:31
16 lines
1241 bytes
1241 bytes
In article <54526@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> hrubin@pop.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) writes: >There have been many attempts to describe quantum mechanics within >probability, but I know of no successful ones. Quantum processes >are far more complicated than stochastic processes. I don't get it. Aren't path integral formulations essentially probabalistic in nature? Also, what about Ed Nelson's stochastic mechanics? I heard a long time ago that Stoch. Mech. made some scattering predictions at variance with QM, and that experiments were going to be done. Is this true? On the other hand, I was given to understand that one had to go quite a long way to get at these deviations from QM. Later, Andrew Mullhaupt
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1097@kepler1.rentec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!psinntp!kepler1!andrewReferences:
<1992Jul17.174536.514@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov> <1992Jul19.202309.29157@galois.mit.edu> <54526@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!psinntp!kepler1!andrew From: andrew@rentec.com (Andrew Mullhaupt) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: The It from Bit: Quantum Logic and Information Theory Message-ID: <1097@kepler1.rentec.com> Date: 21 Jul 92 02:31:07 GMT References: <1992Jul17.174536.514@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov> <1992Jul19.202309.29157@galois.mit.edu> <54526@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> Organization: Renaissance Technologies Corp., Setauket, NY. Lines: 17