Article View: sci.physics
Article #1344Re: Quantum Cosmological Boundaries and Determinisim?
From: Stephen Braham
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 17:40
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 17:40
53 lines
3285 bytes
3285 bytes
jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes: >In article <braham.711770201@physics.ubc.ca> braham@physics.ubc.ca (Stephen Braham) writes: >> [stuff by me deleted] >What do you mean by an "intermediate state"? >By the way, lots of mathematicians use "state" to refer both to pure >states (typically represented by unit vectors in Hilbert space) and >mixed states (aka density matrices). Yes, I'd better be careful- I used state in that sense later. I'm really talking about an intermediate density matrix or wavefunction here, vs. a more general quantum state (or quantum description of the system). By intermediate, I mean intermediate in time, i.e., between 'measurements.' In ADH, we try to give meaning to just HISTORIES, and we bury the idea of a density matrix or wavefunction at a particular time. For a _Hamiltonian_ ADH (which isn't general enough for quantum cosmology, probably), one can go to a generalized approach with both final and initial conditions, and you get a system that cannot be described by a density matrix at any intermediate time, but is fully predictive. Wehn the final state density matrix is just the identity, you get back to pretty standard Copenhagen style Hamiltonian quantum mechanics, and you can almost say that each projection operator IS a Cophenhagen style collapse. I prefer Jim's way of looking at it though, in which you say that you're looking at a purely conditional question, and the collapse is nothing except the standard conditional probability rule. This shouldn't be confused with the _dynamical_ collapse of the wavefunction, induced by decoherence processes- that's a statement on a Shroedinger picture density matrix, and ADH is a lot more general than that. >What is the most lucid and interesting single reference on the >alternative decohered histories approach? I've read a bit about it but >could stand some more. Ewww, hard one. I think I'll have to give you two, because things are in flux, and Gell-Mann and Hartle are redefining their concept of quasiclassical domains. The Jerusalem Winter School (1989) notes are probably the best single description, they're in Quantum Cosmology anb Baby Universes, ed. S. Coleman, J. B. Hartle and T. Piran (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990). The later, modified, stuff is Alternative Decohering Histories in Quantum Mechanics, UCSBTH-90-56. Steve -- | Name: Stephen P. Braham | Perversion: Quantum Cosmologist| | Hangout: UBC physics | Signature: Euclidean | | Vancouver, BC |--------------------------------+ | Canada | E-mail: braham@physics.ubc.ca |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<braham.711826831@physics.ubc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!van-bc!ubc-cs!unixg.ubc.ca!physics.ubc.ca!brahamReferences:
<jtwamley.711766649@adelphi> <braham.711770201@physics.ubc.ca> <1992Jul22.153115.25069@galois.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!van-bc!ubc-cs!unixg.ubc.ca!physics.ubc.ca!braham From: braham@physics.ubc.ca (Stephen Braham) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Quantum Cosmological Boundaries and Determinisim? Keywords: Quantum cosmology Message-ID: <braham.711826831@physics.ubc.ca> Date: 22 Jul 92 17:40:31 GMT References: <jtwamley.711766649@adelphi> <braham.711770201@physics.ubc.ca> <1992Jul22.153115.25069@galois.mit.edu> Sender: news@unixg.ubc.ca (Usenet News Maintenance) Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada Lines: 53 Nntp-Posting-Host: physics.ubc.ca