Re: Twins Paradox Resolved

Article View: sci.physics

Article #1365

#1365

From: Mcirvin
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 00:35

21 lines
1160 bytes

gast@next.ben-fh.tuwien.ac.at (Gast) writes:

>In article <1992Jul22.130948.18912@cs.ucf.edu> clarke@acme.ucf.edu (Thomas  
>Clarke) writes:
>> In article <BrrztE.J4u@well.sf.ca.us> metares@well.sf.ca.us (Tom Van  
>Flandern)  
>> writes:
>> >     For those unfamiliar with SR, SR implies that events synchronized  
>in one
>> >frame will not be synchronized (= simultaneous) in a relatively moving  
>frame.
>> 
>> Not true.

>It is true. Two events that happen simultaniously in one system don't in a  
>system which is moved in respect to the former system.

...at least not if they happened in different *places.*

-- 
Matt McIrvin   mcirvin@husc.harvard.edu   Long live short .sigs

Technical Details

Message-ID: <mcirvin.711851720@husc8>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!caen!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!husc8!mcirvin

References: <1992Jul22.130948.18912@cs.ucf.edu> <1992Jul22.144745.24854@email.tuwien.ac.at>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!caen!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!husc8!mcirvin
From: mcirvin@husc8.harvard.edu (Mcirvin)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Twins Paradox Resolved
Message-ID: <mcirvin.711851720@husc8>
Date: 23 Jul 92 00:35:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: husc8.mcirvin.711851720
References: <1992Jul22.130948.18912@cs.ucf.edu> <1992Jul22.144745.24854@email.tuwien.ac.at>
Lines: 21
Nntp-Posting-Host: husc8.harvard.edu

Reply to Parent Message